Advocates:
['SL JAIN', '', 'VINOD BHADU', 'PP CHOUDHARY', '', 'BK BHATNAGAR', 'NM LODHA', 'RAVI BHANSALI', 'SG OJHA']

(1) CMA -42/96 - Mukh Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.(2)cma.296/96-Katar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan.(3)

CMA.292/96 -Tara Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (4)CMA.453/96-Anop Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan, (5).550/96-

Sukhdeo Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan, (6)cma.43/96-Harbans Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan, (7).179/96-Level Singh Vs.

State of Rajasthan & Ors., (8)CMA.269/96-Gurumail Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and (9)cma.661/96-Lichman

Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan. Judgmetn dt.21.5.09

1/8

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JODHPUR.

JUDGMENT

1. S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.42/1996

Mukh Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

2. S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.296/1996

Katar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan.

3. S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.292/1996

Tara Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

4. S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.453/1996

Anop Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan.

5. S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.550/1996

Sukhdeo Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan.

6. S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.43/1996

Harbans Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan.

7. S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.179/1996

Level Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

8. S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.269/1996

Gurumail Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

9. S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.661/1996

Lichman Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Date of order

:

21^st May, 2009

PRESENT

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI

Mr. S.L. Jain for the appellants.

Mr. Ravi Bhansali )

Mr. DLR Vyas for Mr. B.M. Bora )

Mr. Rajesh Choudhary for L.R. Choduahry) for the respondents.

Mr. Ravi Panwar for Rajesh Panwar )

Mr. Manju Choudhary )

-----

BY THE COURT:-

(1) CMA -42/96 - Mukh Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.(2)cma.296/96-Katar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan.(3)

CMA.292/96 -Tara Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (4)CMA.453/96-Anop Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan, (5).550/96-

Sukhdeo Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan, (6)cma.43/96-Harbans Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan, (7).179/96-Level Singh Vs.

State of Rajasthan & Ors., (8)CMA.269/96-Gurumail Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and (9)cma.661/96-Lichman

Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan. Judgmetn dt.21.5.09

2/8

1.

These appeals arise out of different awards passed by the

Land Acquisition Officer for the land in question acquired under the

provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1893 for Union of India for

defence establishment in 10 L.L.G. Lalgarh Barani Sercond, Kikar

Chak Barani, 21 S.D.S. 22, 23, 24 S.D.S. under which a large chunk

of land was acquired by the State Government for Union of India for

defence establishment.

2.

The land owners filed the reference application under

Section 18 of the Act. The facts of the appeal No.42/1986 -Mukh

Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. are taken here into

account. The award in the present case appears to have been made on

24.12.1977 as noted on page No.2 of the impugned order dated

22.9.1995 whereas the reference application under Section 18 of the

Act was filed by the land owners, the present appellants, before the

learned Land Acquisition Officer, S.D.O., Hanumangarh on 9.6.1983.

The learned S.D.O., Hanumangarh appears to have forwarded the said

reference application to the learned Civil Court, who decided the said

reference application by the impugned order dated 22.9.1995

deciding the both the issues against the land owners. The issue No.1

on the merit of enhancement of compensation for the land acquired

and the issue No.2 of the reference being barred by limitation.

(1) CMA -42/96 - Mukh Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.(2)cma.296/96-Katar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan.(3)

CMA.292/96 -Tara Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (4)CMA.453/96-Anop Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan, (5).5