SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
SUMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP 723/2022



Advocates:
['KAUSHAL GAUTAM', '', 'KUNAL KALLA', 'PP']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 723/2022

1.

Suman W/o Kana Ram, D/o Pokar Ram, Aged About 30

Years, R/o Village Dhanok Teh. Nokha Dist. Bikaner

(Raj.).

2.

Manphool Prajapat S/o Sh. Shanker Lal, Aged About 33

Years, P.S. Ke Pass Kumahro Ka Mohalla Police Line

Gangashahar, Dist. Bikaner (Raj.).

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2.

The Superintendent Of Police, Bikaner.

3.

The Station House Officer, Ps Nokha, Ps Nokha (Raj.).

4.

The Station House Officer, Ps Gangashahar, Rajasthan.

5.

Kana Ram S/o Jhanwar Lal, R/o Dharnok Teh. Nokha

Bikaner (Raj.).

6.

Jagdish Ram S/o Jhanwar Lal, Dharnok Teh. Nokha

Bikaner (Raj.).

7.

Jhanwar Lal S/o Bhanwar Lal, Dharnok Teh. Nokha

Bikaner (Raj.).

8.

Chuni Lal S/o Jhanwar Lal, Dharnok Teh. Nokha Bikaner

(Raj.).

9.

Koja Ram S/o Pokar Ram, Air Force Ke Pass Road Nall

Bikaner (Raj.).

10.

Chandu Lal S/o Goman Lal, Ugampur Teh. Nokha Bikaner

(Raj.).

11.

Mol Chand S/o Chandu Lal, Ugampur Teh. Nokha Bikaner

(Raj.).

12.

Amar Chand S/o Mana Ram, Nokha Road Pabu Chowk

Gangashahar Teh. Nokha Bikaner (Raj.).

13.

Mamta S/o Chandu Lal, Ugampur Teh. Nokha Bikaner

(Raj.).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Kunal Kalla

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-723/2022]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

Order

14/02/2022

This criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioners

with a prayer to give direction to the police authority to provide

them police protection.

After attempting to argue the matter on merits for quite

some time, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that

he does not want to press this criminal misc. petition, however,

seeks liberty for the petitioners to move an appropriate

representation before the Superintendent of Police, Bikaner

ventilating their grievances.

The criminal misc. petition is, therefore, dismissed as not

pressed.

However, the petitioners shall be at liberty to move an

appropriate representation before the Superintendent of Police,

Bikaner.

If any such representation is moved by the petitioners, the

Superintendent of Police, Bikaner shall consider the same

objectively.

The stay petition is also dismissed.

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

53-pratibha/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top