SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
HIRA LAL AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRLMB 5066/2018



Advocates:
['AAKASH KUKKAR', '', 'PET SELF', 'PP']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 5066/2018

1.

Hira Lal S/o Danpat Rai Padiwal , By Caste Maheshwari,

R/o House No. 3/36 Shankar Colony Extension Near

Vicklorious Public School, Sriganganagar.

2.

Smt. Sumita W/o Hira Lal , By Caste Maheshwari, R/o

House No. 3/36 Shankar Colony Extension Near

Vicklorious Public School, Sriganganagar.

3.

Ronak S/o Hira Lal , By Caste Maheshwari, R/o House No.

3/36 Shankar Colony Extension Near Vicklorious Public

School, Sriganganagar.

----Petitioners

Versus

State Of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Aakash Kukkar

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. K.V. Vyas

Mr. M.M. Dhera for the complainant.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Judgment / Order

17/07/2018

This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the

petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with F.I.R.

No.227/2015, Police Station Kotwali, District Sriganganagar for

the offences under Sections 420 and 120-B of IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

agreement in question was entered into between the petitioner

and the complainant in the year 2013. He further submits that the

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-5066/2018]

present case is of civil nature and the criminal machinery was

being used to pressurize the present petitioner.

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and

upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this

Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory

bail to the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed

that in the event of arrest of petitioners (1) Hira Lal S/o Danpat

Rai Padiwal, (2) Smt. Sumita W/o Hira Lal & (3) Ronak S/o Hira

Lal, in connection with F.I.R. No.227/2015, Police Station Kotwali,

District Sriganganagar, the petitioners shall be released on bail;

provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of

Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the

following conditions :-

(i)

that the petitioners shall make themself available for

interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii)

that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any

inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with

the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing

such facts to the court or any police officer; and

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous

permission of the court.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

Sanjaysolanki, srpa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top