HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
M/S RAVI MARBLE UDHYOG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 2879/2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2879/2021
M/s Ravi Marble Udhyog, Nohar Road, Tehsil Rawatsar, District
Hanumangarh Through Proprietor Banwari Lal S/o Shri Udmi
Ram, Aged 60 Years, R/o Subhash Nagar Behind Mistri Market,
Tehsil Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
2.
The Addl. Chief Secretary, Rural Development And
Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan Jaipur.
3.
The Secretary Department Of Rural Development,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4.
The Commissioner - Egs (Mahatma Gandhi Narega) Rural
Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
5.
The District Collector, And Coordinator Mahatma Gandhi
National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme
Hanumangarh.
6.
The Chief Executive Officer Zila Parishad, Hanumangarh.
7.
The Block Development Officer Panchayat Samiti
Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. NR Budania
For Respondent(s)
:
MR. Manish Tak
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
18/03/2021
In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being
taken while hearing the matters in Court.
(2 of 2)
[CW-2879/2021]
The petitioner has preferred this writ petition claiming the
following relief :-
"By an appropriate writ, order in the nature of
mandamus, the respondents may kindly be directed
to ensure the compliance of the rule 29(2)(i) of
Rajathan Transparency in Public Procurement Rule
2013 and initiate the tender process for the financial
y ear 2021-22 and same may be complete on or
before 31.03.2021 or extent the existing contract till
new contract made applicable in terms of RTPP act
2012 & RTPP Rules 2013."
At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents makes a
statement that the respondents are in agreement with the prayer
of the petitioner and shall ensure all necessary compliance of Rule
29(2)(i) of Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement Rule,
2013.
In light of such limited submission made by learned counsel
for the respondents, the writ petition is disposed of.
Stay petition as well as all pending applications stand
disposed of accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
74-Sudheer/-