HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
RAMNIWAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJ. and ORS – Respondent
CW 494/2013
['DR PUSHPENDRA SINGH', '', 'Dr NUPUR BHATI', 'DHIRENDRA SINGH', 'KK BISSA AGC', '', 'DD CHITLANGI']
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 494/2013.
Ramniwas Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Order dated 08/10/2014
1/9
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR.
:: O R D E R ::
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 494/2013.
Ramniwas S/o Sh. Chena Ram Bishnoi
Vs.
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Date of Order
:::: 08
th October, 2014
.
P R E S E N T
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
Appearance:
Mr. T.S. Rathore on behalf of
Dr. Nupur Bhati, for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Patel, Addl. Govt. Counsel.
Mr. D.D. Chitlangi, for the Gram Panchayat- Shri Balaji
- -
BY THE COURT:
1.
The petitioner, Ramniwas S/o Sh. Chena Ram
Bishnoi, has preferred this writ petition in this Court on
10.01.2013 seeking following relief(s): -
“It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully
prayed that this writ petition of the petitioner may
kindly be allowed: -
A.
By an appropriate writ order or
direction, order dated 26.10.2012 (Annex.4) &
29.10.2012 (Annex.5) may kindly be quashed
being devoid of authority of law.
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 494/2013.
Ramniwas Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Order dated 08/10/2014
2/9
B.
By an appropriate writ, order or
direction, order dated 1.1.2013 (Annex.6) may
kindly be quashed to the extent that it places the
petitioner at Gram Panchayat Bhomasar from
Gram Panchayat Shri Balaji and the respondents
may kindly be directed to keep him at Gram
Panchayat Shri Balaji in accordance with the
order of the Tribunal.
C.
Any other appropriate writ, order or
direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just
and proper in the facts and circumstances of the
case may kindly be passed in favour of the
petitioner.
D.
Writ petition filed by the petitioner
may kindly be allowed with costs.”
3.
While issuing notices to the respondents, a
coordinate bench of this Court vide the order dated 17.01.2013
stayed the effect and operation of the order Annex.6 dated
01.01.2013, whereby the suspension order dated 26.10.2012
(Annex.4) of the petitioner who was working as 'Gram-Sevak' in
Gram Panchayat- Shri Balaji, was revoked and a charge sheet
under Rule 17 of the Rajasthan Civil Service (CCA) Rules, 1958
(for short, hereinafter referred to as 'Rules of 1958') was issued
to the petitioner on 29.10.2012, and an explanation was sought
from the petitioner while transferring him from Gram Panchayat
Shri Balaji to Gram Panchayat Bhomasar, and the petitioner was
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 494/2013.
Ramniwas Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Order dated 08/10/2014
3/9
asked to hand over the charge as 'Gram-Sevak' of Gram
Panchayat Shri Balaji to one Sh. Jassaram Gaur. These Gram
Panchayat(s) are within the same Panchayat Samiti, Nagaur.
4.
The respondent- Panchayati Raj Department, has
filed a reply to the writ petition and contested the writ petition.
5.
Today, the matter comes up on application (IA
No.4231/14) filed by the applicant, Gram Panchayat, Shri Balaji,
seeking its impleadment as a party-respondent in the present writ
petition since the petitioner failed to implead them as a
responent.
6.
Mr. D.D. Chitlangi, learned counsel for the applicant
submitted that in pursuance of ad-interim order dated
17.01.2013, upon filing of the contempt petition by the petitioner
being S.B. Contempt Petition No.41/2013-Ramniwas Vs. C.S.
Rajan & Ors., the petitioner was posted back as 'Gram-Sevak' at
Gram Panchayat, Shri Balaji, the original place of his work and
where for certain irregularities committed by the petitioner,
enquiry under Rule 17 of the CCA Rules of 1958 was initiated
against the petitioner.
7.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. T.S. Rathore,
has urged that the Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti-
Nagaur, does not have the jurisdiction to either place the
petitioner under suspension or even transfer him from Gram
Panchayat Shri Balaji to Gram Panchayat, Bhomasar. He