HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1090 / 2017

Narpat Kumar S/o Shri Hari Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward

Number 21, Nehru Colony, Balotra, District- Barmer.

----Appellant

Versus

1.

State of Rajasthan through the Principal Secretary, Local Self

Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2.

Director and Joint Secretary, Directorate, Local Self

Department, Jaipur.

3.

The Secretary, Rajasthan Municipality (Administrative and

Technical) and (Sub- Ordinate and Ministerial) Service

Recruitment Commission, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

4.

Dharmveer S/o Shri Daulat Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o

Ward Number 12, Udaram Chawk, Shriganganagar (Raj.).

----Respondents

_____________________________________________________

For Appellant(s) : Mr. M.A. Siddiqui

_____________________________________________________

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMCHANDRA SINGH JHALA

Order

02/01/2018

Civil Misc. Application No.543/2017:

1.

For the reasons stated in the application delay of 14 days in

filing the appeal is condoned.

Special Appeal (Writ) No.1090/2017:

1.

The appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 11.09.2017

dismissing the application filed by the appellant to be impleaded

as a party in writ petition filed by Dharmveer.

2.

Case pleaded by Dharmveer is that he applied for the post of

Senior Draftsman and was shocked to learn that he was not

(2 of 2)

[SAW-1090/2017]

offered appointment. Case pleaded is that he was not intimated

the date for verification of the documents. As per him his position

in the merit list was at serial no.2. The date fixed for verification

of the documents being 08.06.2016 was not intimated to him.

3.

Suffice it to state the relevant facts to oppose the writ

petition would be with the department and not the applicant.

4.

Whilst it may be true that if Dharmveer succeeds the Court

may direct that Dharmveer’s documents be verified. It is possible

that direction could be that Dharmveer should be offered

appointment.

5.

But that would not mean that the appellant would be entitled

to be impleaded as a party in the writ petition filed by Dharmveer.

6.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

(RAMCHANDRA SINGH JHALA)J. (PRADEEP NANDRAJOG)CJ.

Mohit Tak