HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
GORDHAN RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 3665/2020
['PIYUSH CHOUHAN', '', 'PIYUSH CHOUDHARY', 'SANDEEP SHAH AAG', 'DR NUPUR BHATI', 'VIKRAM SINGH BHATIABDUL MANNAN']
(1 of 5)
[CW-3665/2020]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3665/2020
1.
Gordhan Ram S/o Mewa Ram, Aged About 38 Years,
Caste Jat (Gila), R/o Matabhar Road, Gila Ki Dhani,
Makrana, District- Nagaur.
2.
Raju Ram S/o Late Shyoji Ram, Aged About 48 Years,
Cate Jat Muwal, R/o Muwalon Ki Dhani, Jakhali, Tehsil
Makrana, District - Nagaur.
3.
Bhola Ram S/o Late Shri Ugama Ram, Aged About 47
Years, Cate Jat Muwal, R/o Muwalon Ki Dhani, Jakhali,
Tehsil Makrana, District - Nagaur.
4.
Madhu Ram S/o Shri Baksha Ram, Aged About 40 Years,
Caste Jat (Gila), R/o Gila Ki Dhani, Tehsil Makrana,
District Nagaur.
5.
Khema Ram S/o Hira Ram, Aged About 54 Years, Caste
Jat Bidasar, R/o Bhakaron Ki Dhani, Tehsil Makrana,
District Nagaur.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Mines And Geology, Jaipur.
2.
The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.
District Collector, Nagaur.
4.
Sub-Divisional Officer, Makrana, Nagaur.
5.
Tehsildar, Makrana, Nagaur.
6.
Mining Engineer, Makrana, Khanij Bhawan, Makrana.
7.
Assistant Mining Engineer, Makrana, Khanij Bhawan,
Makrana.
8.
Assistant Mining Engineer (Vigilance), Makrana, Khanij
Bhawan, Makrana.
9.
M/s Gulab And Sons, Makrana Through Its Partner Abdul
Gaffar S/o Gulam Rasool, R/o Idgah Road, Gulzarpura,
Makrana.
----Respondents
(2 of 5)
[CW-3665/2020]
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Piyush Chouhan
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Sandeep Shah, AAG assisted by
Ms. Prathyushi Mehta for res. No.1 to
8.
Dr. Nupur Bhati assisted by Mr. Abdul
Mannan and Mr. Sandeep Soni for res.
No.9
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
22/02/2022
This Civil Writ (PIL) petition has been filed by the petitioners
seeking to espouse public cause by stating that in village Makrana,
Khasra No.103 has been recorded as “Gair Mumkin Rasta”. It is
alleged in the petition that respondent No.9, who was granted
license under Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2007
(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules of MMCR Rules and/or Rules
of 2007’) by the State Government to work out mining activities
over khasra No.58, in the course of mining, has indulged in illegal
mining and encroached upon part of “Gair Mumkin Rasta”
comprising in Khasra No.103. In order to support his averments,
he has filed alongwith the petition, a large number of reports
prepared by spot inspection, which has been prepared by the
Revenue Officials, which indicate to support the case of the
petitioner that the Gair Mumkin Rasta has not only been
encroached upon being used for dumping extracted mining
materials, but also at various places, it has been dug up which
clearly indicates that a part of the road in Khasra No.58 and 104
has been involved in illegal mining activity.
(3 of 5)
[CW-3665/2020]
Replies have been filed by the State as well as private
respondent No.9-lease holders and other reports have been placed
on record. According to reports, which have been submitted
before the Court by the State, land comprised in Khasra No.103
has been used for dumping and some damage has also been
caused to it by mining activity, but the State’s report does not
clearly state regarding any mining activity carried out on the road.
Some of the reports, which have been placed on record by the
respondent No.5, which include mining engineer’s report does not
support the case of the petitioner, but according to this report,
some activity of dumping extracted material is being carried out
by occupants of Khasra Nos.58 and 103.
The respondent No.9 has sought to oppose the writ petition
on the ground that the respondent No.5 has filed suit seeking a
decree of rectification of records and also for declaration and
permanent injunction in his favour stating that khasra N