PREMCHAND – Appellant
Versus
RAJASTHAN STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AJMER – Respondent
CW 4328/2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4328/2022
1.
Premchand S/o Surjaram, Aged About 49 Years, Resident
Of Village Balwa, Tehsil And District Nagaur At Present
Shri Ram Colony Nagaur.
2.
Rampal S/o Mohandas, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of
Village Balwa, Tehsil And District Nagaur
3.
Bheru Singh S/o Bood Singh, Aged About 38 Years,
Resident Of Village Balwa, Tehsil And District Nagaur
4.
Surjaram S/o Laluram, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of
Village Balwa, Tehsil And District Nagaur At Present Shri
Ram Colony Nagaur.
5.
Premdas S/o Magan Das, Aged About 40 Years, Resident
Of Village Balwa, Tehsil And District Nagaur
6.
Hukmaram S/o Manglaram, Aged About 42 Years,
Resident Of Village Balwa, Tehsil And District Nagaur
7.
Kherajsingh S/o Late Shri Lalsingh, Aged About 36 Years,
Resident Of Village Balwa, Tehsil And District Nagaur
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Rajasthan State Electricity Board Ajmer, Through
Managing Director.
2.
Ajmer Vidut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Through Managing
Director, Ajmer.
3.
District Collector, Nagaur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. S.K. Joshi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
30/03/2022
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners being
aggrieved with the action of the respondent - Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran
Nigam Ltd. (for short ‘AVVNL’) of laying down electric poles and
high tension lines over the agricultural land of the petitioners.
The grievance of the petitioners is to the effect that adequate
compensation has not been paid to them by the respondent –
AVVNL.
(2 of 2)
[CW-4328/2022]
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and after
going through the material available on record, this Court is of the
opinion that for the purpose of redressal of grievances against the
action of respondent – AVVNL, the petitioners can very well
approach the respondent – AVVNL as per Section 17 of the Indian
Telegraph Act, 1885 (for short ‘the Act of 1885’).
If the grievances of the petitioners are not redressed by the
respondent – AVVNL, it is for the petitioners to approach the
District Magistrate, Jodhpur for removal/alteration of electricity
lines or for awarding adequate compensation to them.
In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with
liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent authority of
the respondent – AVVNL within a period of two weeks from today
for redressal of their grievances.
It is expected that if any such representation is made on
behalf of the petitioners within a period of two weeks from today
for redressal of their grievances, the competent authority of the
respondent – AVVNL shall consider and decide the same positively
and expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from
the date of submission of the representation.
Needless to say, if the grievances of the petitioners are not
redressed by the respondent – AVVNL, the petitioners are free to
apply before the District Magistrate, Nagaur as per sub-section 2
of Section 17 of the Act of 1885.
Stay petition is also disposed of.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
44-Arun/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.