HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
KARMABAI MAHILA SHIKSHA AVAM GVMSS – Appellant
Versus
STATE REVENUE AND ORS – Respondent
CW 3303/2011
['NISHANT BORA', 'SAHEE RAMSAHEE RAM SUSHMA DHARA', 'DEEPAK JETHWANI', 'BIRBAL SARAN', 'ABHILASHA BORA', 'SUNIL BENIWAL', 'SAHEE RAM', 'SUNDEEP BHANDAWAT']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 3303/2011
Karmabai Mahila Shiksha Avam Gramin Vikas Manav Seva
Sansthan, Osian.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Revenue & Ors.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr.Sunil Beniwal.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr.O.P.Boob, Govt.Counsel.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
26/09/2018
By way of this writ petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, the petitioner institution has approached this
Court with the following prayers:
“It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that
record of the case may kindly be called for and by an
appropriate, writ, order or direction;
(i)
Writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be
allowed with costs.
(ii)
The impugned order dated 03-03-11 (Annexure
P-22) passed by the respondent No. 3, district
collector, Jodhpur may be quashed and set
aside qua the petitioner.
(iii)
That the impugned order dated 03-09-09
(Annexure P-20) passed by the respondent
No.2, Principal, Department of Revenue, Govt.
of Rajasthan may be quashed and set aside
qua the petitioner.
(iv)
The respondents may be directed to issue the
allotment letter in favour of the petitioner
society of the 12 bighas land allotted to the
petitioner in Khasra No. 1885 and 1887.”
Facts in brief are that the petitioner institution, a society
which has been constituted with the aim of upliftment of the
educational status of girls, applied for allotment of 100 bighas of
land for establishment of various facilities so as to subserve the
(2 of 5)
[CW-3303/2011]
objectives of the society. The application submitted by the
petitioner to the Revenue Minister was forwarded to the District
Collector, Jodhpur who, in turn, sought report from the Tehsildar
Osian after inspection and investigation of the suggested site. The
Patwari prepared a proposal report dated 24.6.2008 opining that
12 bighas of Gochar land could be allotted to the petitioner after
setting apart identical chunk of land for Gochar purposes. The
proposal of the Patwari was approved by the Gram Panchayat
Osian. The District Collecor forwarded the requisite documents
with his recommendations to the State Government which
approved allotment of the land ad-measuring 12 bighas to the
petitioner soecity at 50% of DLC rate in the khasras Nos.1885 and
1887 of Village Gram Panchayat Osian under the Rajasthan Land
Revenue Rules, 1963. The society was asked to deposit a sum of
Rs.1,08,575/- so that proceedings could be carried further. The
petitioner deposited the initial charges to the tune of
Rs.1,08,575/- in the govt. treasury but the allotment letter was
not forthcoming. It appears that while the petitioner was pursuing
the matter with the authorities, the ruling party in the State
Government changed hands. The petitioner society filed an
application under the Right to Information Act and it received a
copy of the letter dated 20.12.2010 forwarded by the Deputy
Secretary, Department of Revenue, Govt. of Rajasthan to the
District Collector, Jodhpur. Alongwith the letter, minutes of the
Cabinet Sub Committee meeting dated 15.6.2009 and 2.7.2009
were annexed as per which, the allotments made to various
societies alike the petitioner were cancelled without assigning any
reasons whatsoever. Thereafter, the petitioner received the
impugned order dated 3.3.2011 (Annex.P-22) intimating it that
(3 of 5)
[CW-3303/2011]
the allotment of 12 bighas of land made to it was being cancelled.
The said order is assailed by the petitioner through this writ
petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The respondents have filed a reply virtually admitting all the
averments made in the writ petition but the only substantial plea
which is raised to counter the petitioner’s prayer is that the land
allotted to the petitioner is still recorded as Gochar l