HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4450/2022

Gauri Meena D/o Man Shankar Meena, aged about 30 Years, R/o

Village Khalil, Post Bankora, Tehsil Aspur, District Dungarpur,

Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Rajasthan through Director, Integrated Child

Development Services, Department of Women and Child

Development, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, 2,

Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Services,

Department of Women and Child Development,

Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, 2, Jal Path, Gandhi

Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

3.

The Deputy Director (Administration), Integrated Child

Development Services, Department of Women and Child

Development, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, 2,

Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

4.

The Chairman, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State

Institute of Agriculture Management Premises,

Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Balveer Singh Rathore.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Shashank R. Joshi &

Mr. Sourabh Kant Vyas on behalf of

Mr. Rajeev Purohit, R-4.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order

01/08/2022

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a

direction to respondents to permit her in the ongoing document

(2 of 5)

[CW-4450/2022]

verification process initiated for the post of Pre-Primary Teacher-

2018 pursuant to the advertisement dated 21.08.2018 (Annex.1).

It is, inter-alia, indicated in the petition that pursuant to the

advertisement dated 21.08.2018 (Annex.1) the petitioner applied

for the post of Pre-Primary Education Teacher in ‘ST Women TSP’

category. The petitioner participated in the written examination

and obtained 49.9459 marks.

By notification dated 31.07.2019 (Annex.3), the list of the

candidates, who were called for document verification was issued

by the respondent- Board, wherein for petitioner’s category, the

cutoff was 48.6486, which later on was amended and the

amended list was issued on 27.11.2020 (Annex.4), wherein the

cutoff in petitioner’s category was 43.2432 and the roll number of

the petitioner reflected/appeared in the amended list, however, it

is claimed that the petitioner missed the said list dated

27.11.2020 (Annex.4). Whereafter, after the third list has been

issued on 15.12.2021 (Annex.5), where the cutoff of petitioner’s

category is 40.5405.

Submissions have been made that only when the list dated

15.12.2021 (Annex.5) was issued, the petitioner became aware of

the fact that the list dated 27.11.2020 (Annex.4) containing her

roll number was issued by the respondents and that now the

respondents were granting appointment to the persons, who are

lower in merit to the petitioner in her category. It was emphasized

that on account of lack of the facilities, the petitioner was not

aware of the list dated 27.11.2020 (Annex.4) issued by the

respondents and on getting to know of the list dated 15.12.2021

(Annex.5), whereby appointments were accorded to the

candidates lower in merit to the petitioner, she approached the

(3 of 5)

[CW-4450/2022]

respondents by way of representation, however, the same was not

considered by the respondents. It is submitted that as the

recruitment process is still going on, wherein the orders have been

issued by the respondents according appointment to the

candidates pursuant to the advertisement dated 21.08.2018, the

respondents be directed to accord appointment to the petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Board made

submissions that the main result was declared on 31.07.2019,

which was amended on 27.11.2020 (Annex.4), wherein the roll

number of the petitioner was reflected, however, the petitioner did

not appear for document verification pursuant to list/result dated

27.11.2020 and thereafter the list dated 15.12.2021 (Annex.5)

has been issu