Advocates:
['JP JOSHI', '', 'V JOSHI', 'TARUN JOSHI', 'S JOSHI', 'RENUKA BOHRA', 'T GUPTA', '', 'TRIBHUWAN GUPTA', 'RS MANKAD']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ No. 4807/2004

Anil Kumar Singhvi

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan & Ors.

----Respondents

Connected With

S.B. Civil Writ No. 1676/2005

Jitendra Kumar

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan & Ors.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. J.P. Joshi, Sr. Advocate with

Mr. Siddharth Joshi.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Deelip Kawadia.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

Judgment

24/08/2018

Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material

available on record.

These two writ petitions preferred by the petitioners involve

common question of facts and law and are thus being decided

together by this single order.

The petitioners herein claim to have purchased one shop

each through registered sale deeds after paying valid

consideration in the stilted basement of the multi-storied building

known as ‘Divya Jyoti Apartment’ constructed by the respondent

No.4 M/s. Salibhadra Builders. The petitioners claim to be carrying

on their respective business in the shops lawfully purchased by

them but to their utter shock and surprise, they received notices

under Section 91A of the Urban Improvement Trust A