SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
RADHAKISHAN MEENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 4756/2021



Advocates:
['TANWAR SINGH', '', 'AMBALAL M', 'GULAB SINGH']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4756/2021

1.

Radhakishan Meena S/o Megha Ram Meena, Aged About

37 Years, R/o Villag Batwari, Post Pech Ki Bawari, Tehsil

Hindoli, Dist. Bundi, Raj.

2.

Anita Raj Bairwa D/o Rameshwar Bairwa, Aged About 36

Years, R/o Village Khakhata Post Makhida, Tehsil

Indragarh, Dist. Bundi, Raj.

3.

Seema Chaubdar D/o Laxman Lal Chaubdar, Aged About

30 Years, R/o Bhind Gpo Indra Colony, Tonk, Dist. Tonk,

Raj.

4.

Subhash Bajiya S/o Trilok Singh, Aged About 36 Years,

R/o Village Nani, Post Sihot Choti, Dist. Sikar, Raj.

5.

Mukesh Kumar Arya S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 36 Years,

R/o Village Ajitpura Kalan, Tehsil Kotputli, Dist. Jaipur,

Raj.

6.

Mangi Lal S/o Gopal Ram, Aged About 34 Years, R/o

Village Siniya, Tehsil Makrana, Dist. Nagaur, Raj.

7.

Deva Ram S/o Kalla Ram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o

Village And Post Jakhli, Tehisl Makrana, Dist. Nagaur, Raj.

8.

Nathu Lal S/o Jeevan Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o

Village Madho Ka Bas, Post Bhuteda, Tehsil Govindgarh,

Dist. Jaipur, Raj.

9.

Namita Devi Meena D/o Shiv Singh Meena, Aged About

32 Years, R/o 31 Ganesh Vihar Colony Agra Road Jamdoli,

Dist. Jaipur, Raj.

10.

Mewaram S/o Narayan Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o

Vpo Kukanwali, Tehsil Kuchaman City, Dist. Nagaur, Raj.

11.

Suman Verma D/o Ganpat Lal Verma, Aged About 30

Years, R/o Village Kariron Ki Dhani, Post Banuda, Dist.

Sikar, Raj.

12.

Naresh Kumar S/o Ram Prasad, Aged About 36 Years, R/o

Vpo Minda, Tehsil Nawa, Dist. Nagaur, Raj.

13.

Rinku Choudhary D/o Sultan Singh, Aged About 29 Years,

R/o Vpo Khicharo Ki Dhani Kishanpura, Dist. Jaipur, Raj.

14.

Dooli Chand Gurjar S/o Bhairu Shai Gurjar, Aged About

41 Years, R/o Village Nohra, Post Pratapgarh, Tehsil

Thanagazi, Dist. Alwar, Raj.

(2 of 3)

[CW-4756/2021]

15.

Pratap Singh Meena S/o Bodu Ram Meena, Aged About 33

Years, R/o Village Ranasar, Post Sirohi, Tehsil Neem Ka

Thana, Dist. Sikar, Raj.

16.

Bimla Kumari Sevada D/o Kalu Ram Sevada, Aged About

30 Years, R/o Chainpura, Post Khachriawas, Tehsil

Dantaramgarh, Dist. Sikar, Raj.

17.

Asha Choudhary W/o Rajpal Singh Nitharwal, Aged About

30 Years, R/o Village Sitarampura, Post Malkipur, Tehsil

Chaumu, Dist. Jaipur, Raj.

18.

Dashrath Singh Yadav S/o Pema Ram Yadav, Aged About

30 Years, R/o Vpo Tamau, Tehsil Jayal, Dist. Nagaur, Raj.

19.

Vijay Aala S/o Hanuman Prasad Aala, Aged About 39

Years, R/o Sk Marble G-143, Industrial Area, Bidiyad,

Makarana, Dist. Nagaur, Raj.

20.

Mahender Kumar S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 33 Years,

R/o Vpo Sanwatsar, Tehsil Padampur, Dist. Sriganganagar,

Raj.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department

Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur,

Rajasthan.

2.

Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner.

3.

The District Education Officer, (Elementary Education)

Nagaur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Tanwar Singh

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

18/03/2021

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the

respondents to decide legal notice dated 05.03.2021 sent on

behalf of the petitioners expeditiously.

(3 of 3)

[CW-4756/2021]

2.

In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed

of with a direction to the petitioners to file a representation, along

with photo-stat copy of the legal notice dated 05.03.2021 and

certified copy of the order instant within a period of three weeks.

3.

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid

period, the competent authority shall consider and decide the

same in accordance with law; however, in no case later than three

weeks from the date of receipt of the representation.

4.

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top