HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
CHHAIL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
HC 83/2022
(1 of 2)
[HC-83/2022]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 83/2022
Chhail Singh S/o Shri Sabal Singh, Aged About 47 Years,
Resident Of Dayalpura, Tehsil Ahore, Police Station Ahore,
District Jalore.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of
Home Affairs, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.
The Superintendent Of Police, Jalore.
3.
The Station House Officer, Police Station Ahore, District
Jalore.
4.
Dayananda S/o Shri Sindhgayapaji, By Caste Sindhu,
Resident Of Avalipalam, Bailpura, Post Kora, Police Station
Tamkoor, Banglore (Karnataka).
----Respondents
Connected with
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 84/2022
Chail Singh S/o Sabal Singh, Aged About 44 Years, By Caste
Bhomiya Rajput, R/o Dayalpura, Tehsil Ahore, District Jalore,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.
Superintendent Of Police, Jalore.
3.
S.h.o. Police Station, Ahore, Jalore.
4.
Dayananda S/o Shri Sindhgayapaji, By Caste Sindhu, R/
o Avalipallambailpura, Post Kora, Police Station Tamkoor,
Bangalore.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Pradeep Choudhary
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. R.R. Chhaparwal, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
23/03/2022
The instant habeas corpus petition has been filed by the
petitioner Chhail Singh with a prayer to direct production of the
alleged corpus Mst. ‘Kh’, niece of the petitioner in this Court.
On a perusal of the Missing Person Report No.17/2022 filed
by the petitioner at the Police Station Ahore, District Jalore and
(2 of 2)
[HC-83/2022]
the contents of the application filed by the petitioner under
Section 97 of the Cr.P.C. in the Court of the SDM, Ahore, District
Jalore, it becomes apparent that contradictory stands have been
taken by the petitioner before three different forums.
A perusal of the Missing Person Report indicates that the girl
who is major, went missing from the house of the petitioner on
08.03.2022 without giving any information to anyone. In the
complaint under Section 97 Cr.P.C., the petitioner alleged that the
respondent No.4 lured Mst. ‘Kh’ away from the home of the
petitioner on 08.03.2022 and that she was illegally confined at
Bangalore. The petitioner claims to have collected this information
through Heer Singh, father of the girl. Manifestly, thus, there are
no such allegations in the habeas corpus petition which can
indicate that the corpus is illegally confined in the jurisdiction of
the Rajasthan High Court. In addition thereto, it is clear that the
SDM, Ahore, District Jalore has already issued a search warrant in
the proceedings under Section 97 of Cr.P.C. initiated by the
petitioner. Furthermore, the petitioner has filed two habeas corpus
petitions (D.B. Civil Writ (Habeas Corpus) Petition No.83/2022
and D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition (Writ) No.84/2022), through
different counsel, without disclosing the factum of the other
petition.
Hence, the instant habeas corpus petition (D.B. Civil Writ
(Habeas Corpus) Petition No.83/2022) as well as the habeas
corpus petition (D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition (Writ) No.84/2022)
are dismissed on merits and so also for lack of jurisdiction.
A copy of this order be placed in each file.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
98 and 99-/Devesh/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.