SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
JAGDISH OAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/4120/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4120/2022

(Third Bail)

Jagdish Oad S/o Teja Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Rajiv

Ghandhi Colony, Nagour Circle, Tehsil Phalodi, District Jodhpur

(Raj.)

(Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Jodhpur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Bajrang Singh

Mr. Narayan Dan

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Laxman Solanki, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

Order

01/04/2022

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned

Public Prosecutor.

During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the

petitioner does not want to press this third bail application at this

stage with liberty to file fresh bail application after recording

statements of the Investigating Officer as well as complainant.

The bail application is dismissed as not pressed with the

liberty aforesaid.

However, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case

and particularly the fact that statements of Investigating Officer

and complainant have not been recorded till today and accused-

petitioner is behind the bars since August, 2021, therefore,

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-4120/2022]

learned trial Court is directed to record the statments of both the

witnsses, viz., Investigating Officer and complainant, on priority

basis as early as possible.

(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J

133-Bharti/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top