HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16967 / 2017

Manish Pandya Son of Shri Harish Chandra Pandya, Aged About 36

Years, By Caste Pandya, Resident of VPO Ganoda Tehsil Ghatol

District- Banswara.

----Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Rajasthan Through the Secretary, Department of

Education, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department,

Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

3. Director, Elementary Education, Government of Rajasthan,

Bikaner.

4. Zila Parishad, Banswara Through the Chief Executive Officer.

5. Zila Parishad, Dungarpur Through the Chief Executive Officer.

6. Zila Parishad, Udaipur, Through the Chief Executive Officer.

7. Zila Parishad, Pratapgarh, Through the Chief Executive Officer.

----Respondents

_____________________________________________________

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ramdev Potalia

For Respondent(s) : Ms.Deepika Purohit for Mr.P.R.Singh AAG

_____________________________________________________

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

20/12/2017

1.

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India has been preferred with the following prayers:

“a. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, this

petition may kindly be allowed with costs with the

direction to the respondents to accept the update

data in continuation of application ID of earlier

(2 of 4)

[CW-16967/2017]

application form of the petitioner and copies of

documents as hard copy in reference to the amended

notification dated 11.09.2017 (Ann.4).

b. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the

petitioner may kindly be included in the selection

process of recruitment under heading “Rajasthan

Primary and Upper Primary School Teacher Direct

Recruitment 2016, amended and considering their

higher marks in merit, he may be given appointment

as Teacher Grade III (Level II) in subject English with

all consequential benefits.

c. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, without

including the petitioner in the selection process of

Teacher Grade III (Level II) in subject English

pursuant to the amended notification as well as

earlier notification, the process of selection of Teacher

Grade III (Level II) in reference to amended

notification dated 11.09.2017 may kindly be set aside

and quashed.

d. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the

process of selection initiated under amended

notification dated 11.09.2017 by issuance of order

dated 18.10.2017 (Ann.6) issuing the cut off marks,

list of candidates for counselling issued vide order

dated 24.10.2017 and letter dated 26.10.2017

(Ann.8) day to day programme of final selection

including the counselling of Teacher vide Annexure-6,

7 and 8 may also kindly be set aside and quashed.

e. Any other appropriate order or direction, which this

Hon’ble Court deemed just and proper be passed in

favour of the petitioner.

f. Costs of this writ petition may kindly be allowed to

the petitioner.”

(3 of 4)

[CW-16967/2017]

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the

controversy is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in

Farhad Banu Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B.Civil Writ

Petition No.13986/2017 decided on 08.12.2017), relevant

para 26 of which reads as under:

“26.

Thus, in light of the aforesaid discussion,

this Court allows the present writ petitions by

permitting the petitioners to fill up the forms /

update their information in accordance with the

terms and conditions laid down in the

advertisement/notification dated 11.09.2017, until

20.12.2017.

27.

It is further made clear that if the

petitioners do the needful on or before 20.12.20