SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
TIKAM CHAND DARZI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 5185/2021



Advocates:
['AKHILESH RAJPUROHIT', '', 'Sarika Rajpurohit', 'Deepender Rajpurohit', 'DILIP CHOUDHARY', 'MILAP CHOPRA']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5185/2021

1.

Tikam Chand Darzi S/o Mool Chand Darzi Gram, Aged

About 64 Years, R/o Jain Colony, Borawar, Tehsil Makrana,

District Nagaur (Raj.)

2.

Shobha Ram S/o Ashu Ram, Aged About 44 Years, R/o

Maliyon Ka Mohalla, Borawar, Tehsil Makrana, District

Nagaur (Raj.)

3.

Kistur Chand S/o Panna Lal, Aged About 39 Years, R/o

Meghwalon Ka Mohalla, Borawar, Tehsil Makrana, District

Nagaur (Raj.)

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,

Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan,

Secretariat, Jaipur.

2.

The Collector, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.

3.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Makrana, District Nagaur.

4.

The Tehsildar, Makrana, District Nagaur.

5.

Gram Panchayat, Borawar, Panchayat Samiti, Makrana,

District Nagaur Through Its Sarpanch.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Akhilesh Rajpurohit

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. INDRAJIT MAHANTY

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

07/07/2021

After advancing the arguments for some time, learned

counsel for the petitioners sought to withdraw the present PIL

petition when it was brought to the notice of him that Court would

not entertain such a petition as the impugned land was allocated

(2 of 2)

[CW-5185/2021]

for the purpose of setting up a hostel for minority children

studying in local ITI.

Accordingly, the present writ petition (PIL) is dismissed as

withdrawn. However, it shall be open for the petitioners to

approach the district administration for alternate land which is

appropriate for the Gochar, if the same is found to be unfit.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

(INDRAJIT MAHANTY),CJ

34-praveen/sunils/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top