SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
PUKHA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE and ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SANDEEP MEHTA', 'LR UPADHYAY', 'VR MEHTA', 'DY G A']

1

D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No.6834/2007

Pukha Ram vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No.6834/2007

Pukha Ram vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Date : 14.7.2008

HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J.

HON'BLE MR. CHAND MAL TOTLA, J.

Mr.Vineet Jain for Mr.Sandeep Mehta, for petitioner.

Mr.VR Mehta, PP.

Mr.Pukha Ram, petitioner present in person.

Mst. Chidi, corpus, present in person.

Mr.Bugh Lal, Dy.SP, Bilara a/w Mr.Mangi Lal, HC 7, PS,

Bilara.

- - - - -

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

public prosecutor and Mst. Chidi, who was interrogated

by this Court and who has been brought in the Court on

11.7.2008 by Gopi Kishan, Sub Inspector, from Gujarat

specifically Rajkot.

It appears from the facts of the case that the

Kishore Ram, son of petitioner Pukha Ram, who is father

of corpus Mst. Chidi, submitted a complaint under

Section 97 Cr.P.C. before the S.D.M., Pipar City,

District Jodhpur upon which criminal case no.14/2007

2

D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No.6834/2007

Pukha Ram vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

was registered and a search warrant was issued by order

dated 26.5.2007. However, Mst. Chidi was not produced

in the said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top