HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
LEELA CHARITABLE TRUST – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CW 6421/2006
1
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6421/2006
(Leela Charitable Trust Vs. The Dist. Collector,
Sriganganagar)
Date of order :: 15.02.2008
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Mr.Vikas Bijarnia, for the petitioner.
Mr.O.P. Boob, Addl. Govt. Advocate.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The present writ petition has been filed by
the petitioner-charitable trust in whose favour land was
alloted for performing pious work of distribution of food
to the poor patients and their attendants in the
Government Hospitals.
The contention of the petitioner-trust is that
an application was filed before the District Collector to
grant permission for constructing a kitchen in the
Dharmshala for the purpose of preparing food.
2
However, the said application filed by the petitioner
has been rejected without assigning any reason by one
line order, which reads as under:-
“उपरक वषयनर आप दर पस
पथन पत ननरस कर दय रय ह ।"
Upon perusal of the communication dated
30.10.2006, it is clear that no reason whatsoever has
been assigned for rejecting the application filed by the
petitioner.
However, in the reply filed by the
respondents, it is specifically stated in sub-para-B of
reply to the grounds that the petitioner is already
running a Canteen. The entire intention of the
petitioner seems to disturb the atmosphere of the
Hospital, which cannot be permitted at any cost. The
demand of the petitioner for constructing kitchen is
totally unfounded, because the petitioner-Trust cannot
be permitted to raise construction beyond 40% of the
total area as per agreement. It is further submitted in
3
the reply that as per agreement, petitioner cannot be
allowed to carry out the activities as per its whims and
caprice. At the time of allotment of plot to the
petitioner free of cost, it was made clear that the
petitioner will perform pious and religious work,
therefore, now the petitioner with the intention to carry
out commercial activities has filed the aforesaid
application for granting construction permission under
the law.
After perusing the entire pleadings of the
case, I am of the opinion that if allotment was made to
the petitioner for performing pious and religious work
to distribute food to the poor patients and their
attendants in the Government Hospitals, the petitioner
is required to prepare the food and for that purpose the
construction of kitchen is necessary.
In these circumstances, while quashing the
order Annexure-7, the matter is remanded to the
4
District Collector, Sriganganagar for deciding the
matter afresh after obtaining undertaking from the
petitioner that trust will not use the said premises for
commercial purpose after construction of kitchen, so
also, the petitioner may also file its undertaking that
trust will not use the said premises for commercial
activities. The District Collector, Sriganganagar may
grant permission to the petitioner Trust to construct
kitchen, but the Collector may impose any condition
upon the petitioner, which he deems fit as per the
agreement so that the petitioner Trust may not use the
said kitchen for commercial activities in the garb of
performing pious work of distribution of food to poor
patients and their attendants in the Government
Hospitals.
With the above directions, the writ petition is
disposed of.
(GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J.
A.K. Chouhan/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.