SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
KANTIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
['PN MOHANANI', '', 'MISS YOGITA MOHANANI', 'KAPIL MOHANANI', 'PP']

1

S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.4725/2007

(Kantiya vs. State of Rajasthan)

Date of order

:

September 24, 2007

HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J.

Mr.P.N.Mohanani, for the petitioner.

Mr.Vishal Raj Mehta, Public Prosecutor.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public

Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the

challan papers.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner

that there is no allegation of committing murder punishable

under section 302 I.P.C. against the present petitioner. The

present petitioner has been charged only for the offence under

section 201 I.P.C. There being no evidence for concealing the

offence. It is only that the petitioner got the site map verified.

The allegation of committing murder of deceased Sumer Singh is

against Devi Lal and Smt. Sita. Learned Public Prosecutor also

submits that the allegation of muder is against Devi Lal and Smt.

Sita. So far as present petitioner is concerned, the only

allegation against him is for the offence under section 201 I.P.C.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case

2

and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both

the parties,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top