HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
KAMAL KISHORE – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRLAS 561/2022
['RAMAWATAR SINGH', '', 'SUMER SINGH GOUR', 'JAI KISHAN', 'JASSA RAM', 'PP', '', 'KL CHAUHAN']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 561/2022
Kamal Kishore S/o Shri Purshottam Das, Aged About 30 Years,
B/c Mali, R/o Village Khejadla Tehsil Bilara District Jodhpur.
(At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).
----Appellant
Versus
1.
The State of Rajasthan
2.
Deepa Ram S/o Sh. Mala Ram, R/o Village Khejadla Tehsil
Bilara District Jodhpur.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. R.S. Choudhary
Mr. J.K. Suthar
For Respondent No.1
:
Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, P.P.
For Respondent No.2
:
Mr. K.L. Chouhan
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
25/05/2022
This criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
(hereinafter to be referred as 'the SC/ST Act’) has been filed on
behalf of the appellant being aggrieved with the order dated
31.03.2022 passed by the Special Judge, Schedule Castes and
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Cases) Jodhpur
Metropolitan (hereinafter to be referred as ‘trial court’) in Criminal
Misc. Case No.81/2022, whereby the trial court has dismissed the
bail application filed on behalf of the appellant.
The appellant has been arrested in FIR No.247/2018 of
Police Station Bilara, District Jodhpur for the offences punishable
(2 of 3)
[CRLAS-561/2022]
under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 302 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r),
3(1)(s), 3(2)(Va) and 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act.
Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that after
rejection of earlier criminal appeal of the appellant by this Court,
the statement of the doctor, who has conducted the postmortem
of the deceased, has been recorded before the trial court as PW-9.
Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that PW-9 Dr.
Imran Shekh in his cross-examination has clearly admitted that he
wrote Q to R in Exp.-14 by taking note from BHT, wherein the
meaning of RTA is mentioned as Road Traffic Accident. It is,
therefore, submitted that as a matter of fact, the deceased
received injury on account of road accident, however, due to
previous enmity, the allegation has been levelled against the
appellant of dashing his car in the motorcycle, on which the
deceased was riding along with two other injured persons.
Learned counsel for the appellant has invited my attention
towards the naksha moka of the accident, prepared by the police,
and pointed out that the accident took place exactly on the speed
breaker which suggests that the motorcycle, on which the
deceased was riding, skid at the speed breaker and on account of
that the deceased and two other injured received injuries. It is
submitted that the appellant is in custody since 29.09.2018 and
still the trial against him has not been completed.
Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent
No.1-State as well as learned counsel for the respondent
No.2/complainant have vehemently opposed the prayer made on
behalf of the appellant in this criminal appeal and argued that the
prosecution has produced sufficient evidence to conclude that the
(3 of 3)
[CRLAS-561/2022]
appellant deliberately dashed his car in the motorcycle which
resulted into the death of the deceased.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned
Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.
Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances
of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the
case, I deem it just and proper to allow the appeal filed by the
accused appellant under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act.
Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A(2)
of SC/ST Act is allowed and the order dated 31.03.2022 passed by
the Special Judge, Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities Cases) Jodhpur Metropolitan in Criminal
Misc. Case No.81/2022 is set aside. It is directed that appellant
Kamal Kishore S/o Shri Purshottam Das shall be r