HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
PANKAJ KUMAR @ PIKU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB 5986/2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5986/2022
Pankaj Kumar @ Piku S/o Shri Rajendra Kumar, Aged About 25
Years, R/o Thirajvala Gram Panchayat Karliya, P.s. Goluwala,
Dist. Hanumangarh. (At Present Lodge In Central Jail,
Shriganganagar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sumer Singh Sen
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
29/06/2022
The present interim bail application has been filed under
Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection
with FIR No.158/2020 Police Station Raisinghnagar, District Sri
Ganganagar for the offences punishable under Sections 8/21, 22,
25 & 29 of NDPS Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the father of
the present petitioner is suffering from cardiac disease and his
condition is very much serious. The petitioner is behind the bars
and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be
concluded. Therefore, the petitioner may be enlarged on interim
bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the interim
bail and submits a report from the concerned Doctor of
Government hospital, in which he examined the father of the
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-5986/2022]
present petitioner and mentioned that the treatment of the father
of the present petitioner is going on and the condition of the
patient is not serious, therefore, interim bail may not be granted
to the petitioner.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned
Public Prosecutor.
I have considered the arguments advanced before me and
gone through the material available on record.
According to the report submitted by the learned Public
Prosecutor, the treatment of the father of petitioner is going on
and the condition of the father of the petitioner is not serious. In
these circumstances, no case for grant of interim bail is made out.
Hence, the present interim bail application filed by the petitioner is
hereby dismissed.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
47-Raksha/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.