HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
MUKESH KUMAR MEENA – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent
CW 7434/2021
['ADITYA SINGHI', '', 'ABHAYA BEHERA', 'SUNIL BHANDARI']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7434/2021
Mukesh Kumar Meena S/o Badri Lal Meena, Aged About 31
Years, R/o 19, Bapu Nagar, Phalodi Jodhpur - 342301,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shifted To -
Aaykar Bhawan, 13A Subhash Road Dehradun,
Uttarakhand - 248001. Earlier At - Aaykar Bhawan,
Meerut Road, Muazffarnagar - 251002, U.p.
2.
Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shifted To - 16/69,
Aaykar Bhawan Civil Lines, Kanpur - 208001. Earlier At -
Cgo Complex - 1, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Near Hapur Chungi
Ghaziabad - 201002
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr Abhaya Behera Sr. Advocate
assisted by Mr Aditya Singhi
(through VC)
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr Sunil Bhandari
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Judgment / Order
27/10/2021 (PER HON’BLE BISHNOI,J.)
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner being
aggrieved with the order dated 07.05.2021 passed by learned
Chairman, Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New
Delhi, whereby the application P.T./68/2021 preferred on behalf of
respondent-department has been allowed and O.A. No.14/2021
(2 of 11)
[CW-7434/2021]
pending before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench
has been ordered to be transferred to Central Administrative
Tribunal, Allahabad Bench with a direction to club it with O.As.
No.1031/2017 and 1030/2017 pending before the Central
Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench.
Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was
working as an Inspector in Income Tax Department and was
posted in the Office of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Aligarh. A memorandum of charge was issued by Principal
Commissioner of Income Tax, Aligarh and based on the said
memorandum of charge, a departmental enquiry under Rule 14 of
CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 was initiated and Principal Commissioner
of Income Tax, Muzaffarnagar passed an order on 12.09.2019
removing the petitioner from service.
The petitioner preferred an appeal to the Jurisdictional
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, however, when the appeal was
not decided, the petitioner preferred Original Application
No.14/2021 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur
Bench, Jodhpur, under whose jurisdiction, the petitioner is at
present residing.
The CAT, Jodhpur on 12.01.2021 directed to register
the O.A., admitted the same and issued notices to the
respondents. The next date in the O.A. was fixed as 23.02.2021
and on the date fixed, counsel for the respondents put his
appearance and sought four weeks’ time to file detailed counter
affidavit, which was granted and the next date in the matter was
fixed as 08.04.2021.
In between, the respondents filed a transfer application
under Section 25 of the Central Administrative Act, 1985 before
(3 of 11)
[CW-7434/2021]
Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi
(hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Principal Bench’) on 23.03.2021
seeking transfer of O.A. No.14/2021 filed on behalf of the
petitioner before the CAT, Jodhpur Bench on the ground that three
Income Tax Inspectors involved in the same incident, for which
memorandum of charge was served upon the petitioner, which
resulted into his removal from the service, have also been
terminated and the said Inspectors have filed separate O.As., two
before the CAT, Allahabad Bench and one before CAT, Lucknow
Bench and the same are pending. It is urged that because same
issue is pending before the various Benches of Tribunal and in
order to avoid conflicting views of the various Benches, the O.A.
filed by the petitioner be transferred to CAT, Allahabad Bench.
It appears that after filing of the transfer application on
23.03.2021, one Misc. Application has also been filed by the
respond