HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
POOJA RANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 6937/2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7512/2022
Aman Kumari D/o Shri Jainarayan W/o Shri Ajit Singh, Aged
About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Bhojan, Tehsil Rajgarh,
District Churu.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary,
Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.
The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner.
3.
The District Establishment Committee, Zila Parishad,
Churu.
4.
The District Establishment Committee, Zila Parishad,
Jhalawar.
5.
The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Churu.
6.
Payal Mittal D/o Hansraj Mittal, Through Chief Executive
Officer, Zila Parishad, Jhalawar.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6937/2022
Pooja Rani D/o Shri Rajender Singh W/o Shri Rajveer, Aged
About 29 Years, Near Gogaji Temple, Ward No. 6, Rajgarh,
District Churu.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Panchayati
Raj Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.
The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner.
3.
The District Establishment Committee, Zila Parishad,
Churu.
4.
The District Establishment Committee, Zila Parishad,
Jhalawar.
5.
The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Churu.
6.
Payal Mittal D/o Hansraj Mittal, Through Chief Executive
Officer, Zila Parishad, Jhalawar.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vikas Bijarnia.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Pankaj Sharma, AAG with Mr.
Dhairyaditya Rathore.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
(2 of 5)
[CW-7512/2022]
Order
21/09/2022
These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners
aggrieved against Clause 12.2 (vi) of the advertisement dated
31.12.2021 for recruitment to the post of Teacher Grade-III
(Level-I) in relation to providing reservation to candidates in EWS
category.
Further relief has been sought that as the petitioners fall in
merit in the EWS category, they may be accorded appointment on
the post of Teacher Grade-III (Level-I).
It is, inter-alia, indicated in the petitions that the
advertisement dated 31.12.2021 was issued by the respondents
for recruitment to the post of Teacher Grade-III (Level-I). The
respondents had, inter-alia, provided reservation for the
candidates belonging to EWS category, however, in Clause 12.2
(vi) pertaining to the reservation, it was, inter-aia, indicated as
under :-
“VI. ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk flfoy vihy la[;k
8425@2013 jatuk dqekjh o vU; cuke mRrjk[k.M jkT; o vU;
esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 01-11-2018 ,oa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky;
t;iqj }kjk Mh ch Lis”ky vihy la[;k 1116@2018 jkT; ljdkj
o vU; cuke eatw ;kno o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 18-09-2018
ds vuqlkj jktLFkku jkT; esa fookg mijkUr izokflr gqbZ vkjf{kr
oxZ ¼vkfFkZd :i ls detksj oxZ] vU; fiNM+k oxZ] vfr fiNM+k oxZ]
vuqlwfpr tkfr] vuqlwfpr tutkfr ,oa lgfj;k vkfne tkfr½ dh
efgyk vH;FkhZ dks muds oxZ ds vkjf{kr inksa dk ykHk ns; ugha
gksxk] vr% ,slh efgyk vH;fFkZ;ksa dks lkekU; oxZ ds vUrxZr
vkosnu djuk gksxkA”
(emphasis supplied)
The stipulation debarred, those woman candidates, who are
residents of the State due to marriage from getting the benefit,
inter-alia, of EWS category.
The petitioners applied and claimed their status as EWS and
as per provisional merit list, they were provisionally selected and
(3 of 5)
[CW-7512/2022]
called for document verification. However, in the final merit list,
though the petitioners had obtained marks higher than the cut-off,
their names were not reflected in the said list.
The petitioners made inquiry and were told that in terms of
the stipulation made in the advertisement Clause 12.2(vi) as the
petitioners were born outside the State and were married in the
State and despite falling within the EWS category, they were not
entitled to benefit of reservation and were treated in the General
category and the marks obtained by them were less than the
General category candidates, the petitioners have not been