HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
JAY KUMAR KOTHARI AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
KAILASH CHAND CHOUDHARY AND ORS – Respondent
CW 4874/2015
PUBLIC TRUST - ENTRIES IN REGISTER - CORRECTION - SUIT FOR - SCOPE - SECTION 22 OF THE RAJASTHAN PUBLIC TRUST ACT, 1959 - The scope of a suit under Section 22 of the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 is limited to the correction of entries made under Section 21 of the Act, which relate to entries in the register. The court cannot expand the scope of the suit beyond the legislative intention.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged certain entries in the register of a public trust under Section 22 of the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. The trial court allowed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC filed by the respondents, adding a fresh prayer for conducting fresh elections of the Trust.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that the scope of a suit under Section 22 of the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 is limited to the correction of entries made under Section 21 of the Act, which relate to entries in the register. The court cannot expand the scope of the suit beyond the legislative intention.
Issues: Whether the scope of a suit under Section 22 of the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 can be expanded beyond the correction of entries in the register.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Sections 21, 22, and 23 of the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, which provide for the correction of entries in the register and the consequences of such correction. The court held that the trial court erred in allowing the amendment to the prayer in the suit, as it would expand the scope of the suit beyond the legislative intention.
Final Decision: The High Court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the impugned order dated 28.01.2015, and quashed the amendment sought in the prayer.
(1 of 4)
[CW-4874/2015]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4874/2015
Jay Kumar Kothari And Anr
----Petitioner
Versus
Kailash Chand Choudhary And Ors
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4872/2015
Jay Kumar Kothari And Anr
----Petitioner
Versus
Kailash Chand Choudhary And Ors
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Dhanesh Saraswat, on VC
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vinay Jain, on VC
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
06/01/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its
highly infectious Omicron variant, the lawyers have been advised
to refrain from coming to the Courts.
The petitioner has preferred these writ petitions claiming for
the following prayers:-
SBCPW No.4874/2015 :
“It is, therefore, host humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ
petition may kindly be allowed and the order dated 28.01.2015 may
kindly be quashed and set aside. The application filed under Order
6 Rule 17 CPC may kindly be dismissed with costs.”
(2 of 4)
[CW-4874/2015]
The bone of contention is management of a public trust, in
which certain entries have been challenged under Section 22 of
the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. The Trust is registered with
Devsthan Department, Udaipur.
The petition is against order passed by the trial court
allowing application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of the respondents
while adding fresh prayer of conducting fresh elections of the
Trust.
Counsel for the petitioner Mr. Dhanesh Saraswat has drawn
attention of this Court to Section 21, 22 & 23 of the Rajasthan
Public Trust Act, 1959, which reads as follows:-
“Sec. 21 - Entries in the Register:
1. The Assistant Commissioner shall cause entries to be made in the
register in accordance with the finding recorded by him under section
19 or, if an appeal has been filed under Sec. 20 in accordance with the
decision of the Commissioner on such appeal, and shall cause to be
published on the notice board of his office and at a conspicuous place
in the city, town or village where the principal office or the principal
place of business of the public trust is situate, the entries made in the
register.
2. The entries so made shall, subject to the other provisions of this Act
and subject to any change recorded under any provisions of the Act or a
rule made there under, be final and conclusive.
Sec. 22 - Civil suit against entries made under section 21:
1. Any working trustee or person having interest in a public trust or in
any property found to be trust property aggrieved by any entry made
under section 21 may, within six months from the date of the
publication thereof on the notice board of the office of
the Assistant Commissioner under sub-section (1) of section 21,
institute a suit in a civil court to have such entry cancelled or modified.
2. In every such suit the civil court shall give notice to the State
Government through the assistant Commissioner and the State
Government, if it so desires shall be made a party to the suit.
(3 of 4)
[CW-4874/2015]
3. On the final decision of the suit, the Assistant Commissioner shall, if
necessary, correct the entries made in the register in accordance with
such decision.
Sec. 23 - Changes:
1. Where any change occurs in any of the entries recorded in the
register, the working trustee shall, within ninety days from the date of
the occurrence of such change, or, where any change is desired in such
entries in the interest of the administration of such public trust, the
working trustee may, report in the prescribed form and manner such
change or proposed change to the Assistant Commissioner.
2. For the purpose of verifying the correctness of the entries in the
register or ascertaining whether any change has occurred in any of the
particulars recorded in the register, the Assistant Commissioner may
hold an inquiry.
3. If, after holding such inquiry as he may consider necessa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.