SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
RAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SMT MEENAKSHI and ORS – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISC(PET.) 1377/2015



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 1377 / 2015

Ram Singh S/o Mangu Singh By Caste Ravna Rajput, R/o Gudia

Station Via Pipaliya Kalan, Tehsil Raipur, Distt. Pali.

………..Petitioner

VERSUS

1.

Smt. Meenakshi W/o Ram Singh, resident of 144, Shiv

Colony, Police Lines, Pali.

2.

Harshita D/o Ram Singh, minor through her natural guardian

mother Smt. Meenakshi W/o Ram Singh, resident of 144,

Shiv Colony, Police Lines, Pali.

3.

Vishal S/o Ram Singh, Minor through his natural guardian

mother Smt. Meenakshi W/o Ram Singh, resident of 144,

Shiv Colony, Police Lines, Pali.

………….Respondents

____________________________________________________

Counsel For Petitioner(s) : Dr. A.A. Bhansali

_____________________________________________________

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

Judgment / Order

25/01/2017

This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has

been filed on behalf of the petitioner being aggrieved with the

order dated 22.1.2015 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Pali

(hereinafter referred to as the trial court) in Case No.202/2014,

whereby, the trial court has directed the petitioner to pay interim

maintenance to the respondents to the tune of Rs.2500/- from the

date of filing of the application.

This criminal misc. petition was presented before this Court

on 11.5.2015 and the office has pointed out as many as three

defects, however, the same have not been removed till date.

(2 of 2)

After going thorough the impugned order passed by the trial

court, this court does not find any illegality in the same as

admittedly the respondents are wife and children of the petitioner

and he has failed to prove before the trial court that the

respondents are having sufficient means to maintain themselves.

In view of the above, no case for interference in this criminal

misc. petition is made out.

Hence, this criminal misc. petition is dismissed for non

removal of defects as well as on merits.

(VIJAY BISHNOI), J.

ms rathore/1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top