HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MEVARAM MEHTA – Respondent
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
: O R D E R :
Manoj Kumar vs. Mevaram Mehta
(S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3105/2005)
DATE OF ORDER ::: JULY 15, 2005
P R E S E N T
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH TATIA
_______________________________________
Mr. Girish Joshi, for the petitioner.
BY THE COURT :
REPORTABLE
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The petitioner/plaintiff says that the delay with which
he has raised objection is immaterial and the delay which
was committed by the respondent/defendant in contesting the
suit is more material to the extent that the defendant may
be deprived from raising of the defence in a civil suit.
This has happened because of the fact that as per Rule
1 of Order 8 CPC, the defendant is required to file written
statement within thirty days from the date of service of
summons on him. Proviso to Rule 1 of Order 8 CPC provides
that in case, the defendant fails to file the written
2
statement within thirty days period from service of summons
upon him, he can be allowed to file the written statement
only upto the period of ninety days that too from the date
of service of summons only. That is not enough but for that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.