[1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JODHPUR

:::

1.

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4094/2005

Smt. Madhu Bala Prabhakar Vs. Sindh Vidhya

Mandir Samiti & Ors.

2.

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4093/2005

Smt. Anjana Vyas Vs. Sindh Vidhya Mandir

Samiti & Ors.

3.

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4095/2005

Smt. Praveena Trivedi Vs. Sindh Vidhya Mandir

Samiti & Ors.

4.

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5744/2005

Smt. Chanda Lodha Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

5.

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6302/2005

Smt. Meera Nihalani Vs. Sindh Vidhya Mandir

Samiti & Ors.

6.

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6303/2005

Smt. Pramila Ahuja Vs. Sindh Vidhya Mandir

Samiti & Ors.

7.

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6304/2005

Smt. Meenu Tandon Vs. Sindh Vidhya Mandir

Samiti & Ors.

Date of order: 14.5.2015

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS

Mr. GR Kalla

]

Mr. Deelip Kawadia

], for the petitioners.

Mr. Sanjeet Purohit

]

Dr. Nupur Bhati with Ms. Anita Gehlot

Mr. Tanwar Singh

Mr. BL Bhati, Government Advocate, for the respondents.

<><><>

[2]

All above writ petitions are filed by the petitioners

against the judgment dated 24.3.2005 passed by the

Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institution Tribunal,

Jaipur whereby the appeals filed by the petitioners were

partly allowed in the following manner:

“उक वचननसर, अपललरयगण (अल हम करन) क

उक अपल आश!क रप स सकर क जत ह&। समसत

अपलरयगण क अपल बबत स समप* क आलचय आद!

ददनक 11.01.2005

बबत खररज क जत ह& लककन

अपलरयगण क अनय अनतष ज&स बकय तन ददनक

01.05.2004

स ददय जन बबत ए चयपनत तनमन

पनरक5त तनमन क लभ7 क समबन9 म सकर क जत ह&।

पतय< सस क आदश!त ककय जत ह& कक इस समबन9 म

पनयमनसर सगणन कर ज भ रश! अपलरयगण क सस

म बनत ह और पररशसम म आत ह,

उसक भगतन

अपलरयगण क तन मह क अर9 क भतर-2

कर ।

च?कक, अपलरय, शमपत हम करन न इस समबन9 म अपन

अपल क जररय कई पन नह क ह&, अत: उसक समबन9 म

कई आद! पतय< सस क उक लभ7 क समबन9 म नह ददय

ज रह ह&।"

As per brief facts of the case, all the petitioners were

appointed on the post of Teacher Grade-III by the

respondent no.1 after due selection and on completion of

probation period, their services were confirmed.

The respondent no.1 Sindh Vidhya Mandir Samiti

(hereinafter referred to as the respondent no.1-Samiti for

short) is running a Senior Secondary School known as Nav

Bharat Uchh Madhyamik Vidhyalaya, Udaipur. The school

was getting aid up to the extent of 80% from the State of

Rajasthan and accordingly, all the petitioners were working

on the aided posts but due to abolition of certain posts, the

State Government withdrawn the aid and in compliance of

said order for terminating the services of the petitioner on

11.1.2005, all the petitioners challenged the order of their

[3]

termination by way of filing appeal under Section 19 of the

Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institution Tribunal

Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1989 for

short) in which it was submitted that their termination is in

violation of Section 18(3) of the Act of 1989 and rule 30 of

the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institution

(Recognition, Grand-in-aid and Service Conditions Etc.)

Rules, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules of 1993

for short) because prior to terminating the services of the

petitioners, no prior approval was obtained by the

institution, in spite of fact that approval is mandatory in

nature.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all

the appeals were dismissed against the termination orders

by the tribunal on the ground that a unanimous decision

was taken by the administrative committee of the institution

to terminate the services of the petitioners for the reason

that the State Government stopped the aid and due to

curtailment of aid the institution is suffering financial crises.

The tribunal held t