HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
SANTOSH BAI @ SANTU BAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN-STATE – Respondent
CRLMB 7813/2021
['DEEPAK MENARIA', '', 'MOH RASHEED', 'PP']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8221/2021
Kanahaiya Lal S/o Bhagwan Lal Gurjar, Aged About 48 Years,
Tadawada Solankiya, P.S. Charbhuja, Dist. Rajsamand.
(At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Rajsamand).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan through P.P.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7813/2021
Santosh Bai @ Santu Bai W/o Bhagwan Lal, Aged About 45
Years, Tadawada Solankiyan, Police Station Charbhuja, Dist.
Rajsamand.
(At Present Lodged In District Jail, Rajsamand).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Deepak Menaria through VC
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Mohd. Javed Gauri, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
(VACATION JUDGE)
Order
25/06/2021
In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8221/2021:-
(Kanahaiya Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to
withdraw the present bail application filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the present bail application moved on behalf
of the petitioner Kanahaiya Lal S/o Bhagwan Lal Gurjar
filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn.
In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7813/2021:-
(Santosh Bai @ Santu Bai Vs. State of Rajasthan)
The present bail application has been filed under Section
439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody
in connection with F.I.R. No.112/2021, Police Station
Charbhuja, District Rajsamand, registered for the offences
under Section 341, 323, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal
Code.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner through video
conferencing and learned Public Prosecutor, present-in-person.
Perused the material available on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that petitioner is
a 45 years old lady; no injury has been declared as grievous
and dangerous to life; no specific injury has been attributed to
the petitioner; and trial will take time. With these submissions,
learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail
may be granted to the petitioner.
Per contra learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail
application and stated that allegations have been leveled
against both the accused-petitioners; statement of the injured
has not been recorded till today and expert opinion in regard to
the injury report prepared on 25.05.2021 has not been
obtained yet.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
particularly looking to the facts that the petitioner is a 45 years
old lady; the expert opinion on the injury report which had
been prepared before one month has still not been obtained till
today; and trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore,
without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the
case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed
by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered
that the petitioner Santosh Bai @ Santu Bai W/o Bhagwan
Lal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.112/2021, Police
Station Charbhuja, District Rajsamand, shall be released
on bail if not wanted in any other case; provided she furnishes
a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of
Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court
with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of
hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
However, it is made clear that after obtaining expert
opinion, if it is found that the injuries are declared grievous in
nature and are dangerous to life then, the prosecution shall be
at liberty to file an application seeking cancellation of bail.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA), VJ
21-22-Rashi/-