HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
JITENDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRLMP 1467/2011
['FARZAND ALI', '', 'MUKHTAR KHAN', 'PP']
S.B. CRI. MISC. PETITION NO. 1467/2011
(Jitendra Vs. State of Rajasthan)
DATE OF ORDER : 27.09.2011
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Mr. Jitendra, petitioner, present in person.
Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, Public Prosecutor.
The petitioner – Jitendra submits that in this case, two
vehicles were seized in the investigation of FIR No.125/2011
registered for offences under Sections 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10 of the
Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and
Regulation of Temporary Immigration) Act.
The application under Section 451 Cr.P.C. was filed for
releasing the two vehicles, which was rejected on 29.06.2011 by
the learned trial court. In this case, Ifran was the owner of the
truck seized and the petitioner was the owner of the Tata Indica
Car seized during the course of investigation in the aforesaid FIR
No.125/2011. The revision filed against the order of the learned
trial court dated 29.06.2011 was also rejected by the learned
Sessions Judge, Banswara and the rejection of the application
under Section 451 Cr.P.C. was upheld.
This Court considered the misc. petition under Section 482
Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of co-accused Irfan, who was the
registered owner of the truck and the said misc. petition
No.1466/2011 has been allowed by this Court on 12.09.2011.
While considering the said petition, this court observed that
there is no provision in the Bovine Animals Act for confiscation of
the vehicle in question and that the said Act reveals that there is
no provision in the Act whereby the means of transportation can
be confiscated.
In this view of the matter, there cannot be any reason to
deny the interim custody of the vehicle to its registered owner.
-2-
Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is allowed. The
learned Judicial Magistrate is directed to release the vehicle in
question i.e. the Tata Indica Car bearing registration No.M.P.-09
CB-6034 to the petitioner on Supardginama. The terms of the
Supardginama shall be determined by the learned Magistrate.
(SANDEEP MEHTA), J.
ms rathore