SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
SIKANDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAKESH ARORA', '', 'VINAY ARORA', 'PP']

[1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JODHPUR

O R D E R

Sikandar Vs. State of Rajasthan

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 1242 of 2016

DATE OF ORDER:

August 5, 2016

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA

Mr. Rakesh Arora, for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, Public Prosecutor for

the State.

BY THE COURT :

Accused-petitioner has preferred this

misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to assail

impugned order dated 29th of April 2016, passed by

Addl. Sessions Judge, Jaitaran, District Pali (for

short, ‘learned revisional Court’), whereby the

learned revisional Court, while dismissing the

revision petition, has affirmed order dated 17th of

October, 2015, passed by Addl. Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Jaitaran, District Pali (for short,

‘learned trial Court’).

[2]

Succinctly stated, the facts giving rise to

this misc. petition are that complainant Mahendra

Singh submitted a written report to the SHO, Police

Station Jaitaran on 12th of May 2015 stating therein

that on 26th of March 2016 he received messages on

his cell-phone from mobile No.9829607418 which

were also sent to Devaram and Motil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top