HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AASAN SHRINATHJI MANDIR TRUST – Appellant
Versus
SHRI DIENSH CHANDRA JAIN – Respondent
CCP 27/2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civ. Contempt Pet. No. 27/2019
Aasan Shrinathji Mandir Trust, Through Its Secretary Mahant
Laxman Nath Son Of Late Shri Jagdish Nath, B/c Nath Aged
About 37 R/o Gulab Sagar, Near Mahilabagh Jhalara, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shri Diensh Chandra Jain, District Collector, Pali.
2.
Shailendra Singh, Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub-Division
Office, Marwar Junction.
3.
Madho Ram Purohit, The Tehsildar, Tehsil Office, Marwar
Junction.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Surendra Singh Choudhary.
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
14/10/2019
This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner
alleging violation of the interim order dated 10.01.2019 passed by
this Court in S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.3/2019.
In the second appeal filed by the petitioner against State of
Rajasthan; SDO, Marwar Junction; and Tehsildar, Marwar Junction,
the respondents were directed not to alienate the suit property.
In the contempt petition allegations have been made against
the persons named as respondents i.e. District Collector, SDO &
Tehsildar alleging that certain third party has put up the entrance
gate, which amounts to the violation of the interim order passed
by this Court and therefore, the respondents be proceeded
against.
(2 of 2)
[CCP-27/2019]
A perusal of the interim order granted by this Court reveals
that only the alienation of the suit property was stayed and when
on 23.05.2019, the petitioner wanted the interim order to be
converted into for maintaining status quo, the same was
specifically declined by this Court. The allegations made in the
contempt petition only pertains to alleged change of status quo
and that also does not pertain to the title of the suit property and
therefore, it cannot be said that the interim order granted by this
Court on 10.01.2019 has been violated in any manner.
Consequently, no case for alleged violation of the directions
issued by this Court is made out.
The contempt petition has no substance, the same is,
therefore, dismissed.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
37-Rmathur/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.