Advocates:
['SURENDRA SINGH CHOUDHARY', '', 'OM PRAKASH', 'VINIT SANADHYA']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8611/2021

1.

Prabhu Lal Meghwal S/o Shri Parasa Ram, Aged About 36

Years, R/o Amba Mata Road, Jhadol, Udaipur, Rajasthan.

2.

Prem Meghwal S/o Shri Nathu Lal, Aged About 34 Years,

R/o Ogna, Tehsil Jhadol, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

3.

Dilkhush Kalal S/o Shri Kurichand, Aged About 29 Years,

R/o Village Palsiya, Tehsil Kherwara, District Udaipur,

Rajasthan.

4.

Bharat Kumar Meghwal S/o Shri Mangi Lal Meghwal, Aged

About 29 Years, R/o Village Badarana, Post Gogla, Tehsil

Jhadol, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

5.

Gajendra Kumar Meghwal S/o Shri Parasa Ram, Aged

About 37 Years, R/o Village Badarana, Post Gogla, Tehsil

Jhadol, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

6.

Hemant Kumar Bhatt S/o Shri Punam Chand Bhatt, Aged

About 36 Years, R/o Village Badarana, Tehsil Jhadol,

District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary Education

Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2.

Rajasthan Service Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,

State Agriculture Management Institute Premises,

Durgapura, Jaipur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Surendra Singh Choudhary

For Respondent(s)

:

Ms. Shalini Audhichya for

Mr. Vinit Sanadhya

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

09/07/2021

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the

respondents to decide their representation.

(2 of 2)

[CW-8611/2021]

2.

In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed

of with a direction to the petitioners to file a representation within

a period of two weeks.

3.

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid

period, the respondents shall consider and decide the same in

accordance with law within a period of 60 days from the date of

receipt of the representation.

4.

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petitioners’ grievance. The same may not

be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

particular manner.

5.

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J

155-A.Arora/-