SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
MUKESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JODHPUR

S.B. CRM. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.5106/2016

(Mukesh Narayaniwall Vs. State of Raj. )

Date of Order

:

28.06.2016

P R E S E N T

HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE DEEPAK MAHESHWARI

(VACATION JUDGE)

Mr. Jitendra Ojha, for the petitioner.

Mr. JPS Choudhary, PP.

- -

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available

on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

accused petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2016. The only

allegation made against him is that the marriage which he got

contracted between Deepak and Kamini was not with the lady

of caste ‘Soni’ but Kamini was from ‘Balai’ caste. Allegation

against him is triable by Magistrate. The trial of the case will

take long time to be concluded, therefore, it is prayed that the

accused petitioner may be released on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the

prayer of bail.

2

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case

and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of

the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application

filed by the petitioner deserves

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top