SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
M/S. BEYLIM INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
RAJ. STATE INDU. DEVE. and INV. CORP. andANR – Respondent
CW 5273/2016



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR

RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

--------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL WRIT (CW) No. 5273 of 2016

Petitoner:-

M/S Beylim Industries, through its Partner Mohd Yusuf

Qureshi s/o Mohd. Ismail, aged about 70 years, By

caste Musalmaan, Resident of Aadarsh Mohalla. Ghas

Mandi Road, Jodhpur.

Respondents:-

1. Rajasthan State Industrial Development Corporation

Limited through its Managing Director, Udyog Bhawan,

Jaipur.

2. Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Industrial

Development Corporation Limited, Mini Udyog Bhawan,

Industrial Estate, New Power House Road, Jodhpur.

Date of Order : 19.09.2016

HON'BLE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI, J.

Mr. Harish Purohit, for the petitioner.

ORDER

-----

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner

seeking a direction for the respondent-RIICO to

complete the formalities and hand over the plot No. SP-

3 to the petitioner as per its decision dated 16.07.2010

(Annex-5).

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

respondent-RICCO is not implementing its decision

dated 16.07.2010 on the ground that one M/s R.K.

Textile has filed a writ petition No. 5971/2010 before

this Court with a prayer for allotment of the very same

plot SP-3 and as the said writ petition is still pending,

therefore, the decision dated 16.07.2010 cannot be

implemented. Learned counsel for the petitioner has

also informed that the petitioner has moved an

application for being impleded as party respondent in

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5971/2010 and the same is

pending consideration.

In view of the fact that the application of the

petitioner for being impleded as party respondent in

writ petition No. 5971/2010 is still pending, I am not

inclined to interfere in this writ petition at this stage.

Hence, this writ petition is dismissed.

Stay petition also stands dismissed.

(VIJAY BISHNOI), J.

Taruna

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top