SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
CHITTAR LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB 8975/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR.

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 9180/2022.

Shyamlal S/o Shri Pyarchand Dhakkad, aged 35 years, R/o

Patiyal, P.S. Singoli, District Neemuch, Madhya Pradesh.

(Presently Lodged In District Jail, Chittorgarh).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8975/2022.

Chittar Lal S/o Sohan Lal Kumawat, aged about 45 years, R/o

Kemri, Police Station Kareda, District Bhilwara (Raj.).

(At Present Lodged In District Jail, Chittorgarh)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Vijay Kumar Gaur.

Mr. Hukam Singh Chouhan.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP.

(2 of 3)

[CRLMB-9180/2022]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Order

14/07/2022

The present bail applications have been filed under Section

439 Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with

F.I.R. No. 41/2020, Police Station Begu, District Chittorgarh, for

the offences punishable under Sections 8/15, 8/29 of the Narcotic

Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that similarly

situated co-accused persons, namely, Chittar Lal S/o Bhanwar Lal

Dhakad, Kailash Chand, Radha Kishan, Radhey Shyam and

Baluram, have already been granted bail by the co-ordinate

Bench/s of this Court and the case of the present petitioner is not

distinguishable from those of the co-accused. Challan of the case

has already been presented. No investigation is pending against

the petitioners. The petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial

of the case will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the benefit of

bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently

opposed the bail applications.

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and

gone through the material available on record.

(3 of 3)

[CRLMB-9180/2022]

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case,

without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it

just and proper to release the petitioners on bail.

Accordingly, both the bail applications under Section 439

Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners,

Shyamlal S/o Pyarchand Dhakkad (No. 9180/2022) and

Chittar Lal S/o Sohan Lal Kumawat (No. 8975/2022), shall be

enlarged on bail in F.I.R. No. 41/2020, Police Station Begu, District

Chittorgarh, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in

the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of

Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge

for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of

hearing as and when called upon to do so.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

112-113-Mohan/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top