HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
PANKAJ CHOUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
KAILASH CHOUDHARY – Respondent
EP 6/2019
['MAHMOOD PRACHA', '', 'RAJAK K HAIDAR', 'MOHAMMED MUNEER DHERA']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Election Petition No. 6/2019
Pankaj Choudhary S/o Shri S.S. Choudhary, Aged About 44
Years, R/o II/3 Gandhi Nagar, Bajaj Nagar Marg, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Kailash Choudhary S/o Shri Taga Ram Choudhary, R/o
Ward No. 32, Jat Colony, Samdari Road, Balotra, Tehsil
Pachpadra, District Barmer.
2.
Election Commission Of India, Through Chief Election
Commissioner, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New
Delhi.
3.
Chief Election Officer, State Election Commission,
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4.
Returning Officer, 17, Barmer Parliamentary Constituency,
Barmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Mohamood Pracha.
Mr. Rajak Khan Haidar.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. M.M. Dhera.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Reportable
Judgment
27/04/2021
This election petition under Sections 80, 80A, 81 and 100(1)
(c) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (‘the Act’) has
been filed by the petitioner calling in question the election of
respondent No.1 from the Barmer Parliamentary Constituency of
Rajasthan.
It is, inter alia, indicated in the petition that the Election
Commission of India (‘ECI’) notified the following schedule for
(2 of 16)
[EP-6/2019]
holding election to various Parliamentary Constituencies including
Barmer Parliamentary Constituency as under:-
“
Sr.No.
Particulars
Date
1.
Date of issuing the gazette
notification
02.04.2019
2.
Last date for filing nomination
09.04.2019
3.
Date for scrutiny of nomination
10.04.2019
4.
Last date for withdrawal of
nomination
12.04.2019
5.
Date of polling
29.04.2019
6.
Date of counting/declaration of
results.
23.05.2019
”
It is indicated that the petitioner is an erstwhile IPS Officer
appointed by the Govt. of India in Rajasthan Cadre. He was
dismissed from service vide order dated 19.02.2019 passed by the
Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs for violating the Conduct
Rules, 1968. It is claimed that as the petitioner was a proposed
candidate for the Barmer Parliamentary Constituency for
Parliamentary Elections to be held between April-May, 2019, he
contacted the Secretary, ECI through Fax, E-mail, WhatsApp and
personally handed over a letter to the ECI on 01.04.2019
requesting issuance of certificate under Sections 9(2) and 33(3)
of the Act, which was necessary for the petitioner to contest the
elections.
The notification for Parliamentary Elections was issued on
02.04.2019 and as per the schedule, last date for filing nomination
for Barmer Parliamentary Constituency was 09.04.2019, the
scrutiny was held on 10.04.2019 and the last date of withdrawal
of nomination was 12.04.2019. The petitioner filed his nomination
papers for Barmer Parliamentary Constituency on 08.04.2019.
(3 of 16)
[EP-6/2019]
It is indicated in the petition that the nomination papers
were not accompanied by certificate envisaged under Section
33(3) of the Act.
It is alleged that the ECI, despite the letter dated
01.04.2019, did not issue certificate to the petitioner, however the
Under Secretary of ECI issued a letter dated 04.04.2019 to the
Chief Electoral Officer, Rajasthan, Jaipur regarding miscellaneous
complaints and required it to take appropriate action, in
consonance, the Chief Electoral Officer, Rajasthan, Jaipur
addressed a letter dated 06.04.2019 to the Secretary, ECI
indicating that the certificate was required to be issued by the ECI,
New Delhi.
It is then indicated in the petition that scrutiny of the
nomination papers was held on 10.04.2019, the petitioner made a
request to ECI on 10.04.2019 at around 1.03 PM seeking issuance
of requisite certificate under Section 33(3) of the Act, however,
the same was not responded to. As a result, the nomination form
of the petitioner was rejected by the Returning Officer as per
Section 36(2)(b) of the Act in absence of requisite certificate.
It