SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
PREM SINGH CHOUHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
SAW 689/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

D.B. Civil Spl. Appl. Writ No. 689/2022

1.

Prem Singh Chouhan, S/o Laxman Singh Chouhan, aged

26 years, R/o Village Bhopalpura, Post Bhabrana, Tehsil

Salumber, District Udaipur.

2.

Arvindra Singh Shaktawat S/o Sajjan Singh Shaktawat,

aged 29 years, R/o Village Bhimpur, Post Shyampura, Tehsil

Semari, District Udaipur.

3.

Mahendra Singh Chouhan, S/o Karan Singh Chouhan, aged

24 years, R/o Village Bandarwada, Post Dagar, Tehsil

Salumber, District Udaipur.

4.

Devi Singh Rathore, S/o Pratap Singh Rathore, aged 22

years, R/o Mukam Post Bassi Singawat, Tehsil Salumber,

District Udaipur.

5.

Mayank Ameta S/o Kailash Chandra Ameta, aged 27 years,

R/o 385, Kabutar Khana Basti, Loharo Ka Mohalla, Wali,

Tehsil Girwa, District Udaipur.

6.

Pravin Singh Jhala S/o Narayan Singh Jhala, aged 29 years,

R/o Village Nayagaon, Post Khakhad, Tehsil Jhadol

(Phalasia), District Udaipur.

7.

Jaswant Singh Rathore S/o Onar Singh Rathore, aged 22

years, R/o Sablawat, Post Saradi, Tehsil Salumber, District

Udaipur.

8.

Madhu Singh Rajput, S/o Onar Singh Rajput, aged 30

years, R/o Mukam Mahadev Khera, Post Bassi Samchot,

Tehsil Salumber, District Udaipur.

9.

Lakhan Joshi S/o Chandra Prakash Joshi, aged 23 years,

R/o Bassi Singawat Parshuram Nagar, Joshi Colony, Bassi

Samchot, Tehsil Salumber, District Udaipur.

----Appellants

Versus

1.

The State of Rajasthan, through the Chairman, Rajasthan

Subordinate & Ministerial Services Selection Board, Jaipur.

2.

Secretary, Rajasthan Subordinate & Ministerial Services

Selection Board, Jaipur.

--- Performa Respondents.

3.

Dharmendra Singh Chouhan, S/o Swaroop Singh Chouhan,

aged 23 years, R/o Bhabrana, Tehsil Salumber, District

Udaipur.

4.

Hamer Singh Rajput S/o Jawan Singh Rajput, aged 26

years, R/o Mukam Pani Kotda (Sablavat), Tehsil Salumber,

District Udaipur.

5.

Lokendra Singh Chouhan S/o Bhim Singh Chouhan, aged

(2 of 5)

[SAW-689/2022]

22 years, R/o Mukam Post Garhi, Tehsil Garhi, District

Banswara.

6.

Anar Singh Chouhan S/o Laxman Singh Chouhan, aged 29

years, R/o Bhabrana, Tehsil Salumber, District Udaipur.

7.

Laxman Singh Sisodia S/o Bhanwar Singh Sisodia, aged 23

years, R/o Mukam Roba, Post Jagat, Tehsil Girwa, District

Udaipur.

8.

Mohit Purbia S/o Prakash Purbia, aged 24 years, R/o

Village Beera, Tehsil Jhadol (Phalasia), District Udaipur.

9.

Hemendra Singh Rathore S/o Parvat Singh Rathore, aged

23 years, R/o Village Leelwasa, Tehsil Aspur, District

Dungarpur.

10.

Manohar Singh S/o Fateh Singh, aged 22 years, R/o Bassi

Singawat, Pratapnagar, Tehsil Salumber, District Udaipur.

11.

Ratandeep Singh Chouhan S/o Sajjan Singh Chouhan,

aged 30 years, R/o Village Parda Vageri (Gairwala), Tehsil

Sagwara, District Dungarpur.

12.

Rajendra Singh Chouhan S/o Bheru Singh Chouhan, aged

23 years, R/o Kundli, Post Karakalan, Tehsil Salumber,

District Udaipur.

----Respondents

For Appellant(s)

:

Mr. Ritu Raj Singh.

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Judgment / Order

08/07/2022

The appellants applied for appointment to the post of Village

Development Officer in pursuance of Advertisement dated

06.09.2021 issued by the respondent No.2. In the Advertisement,

it was clearly mentioned that the examination for appointment on

the post of Village Development Officer shall be conducted in two

phases i.e. preliminary examination and Mains examination. The

Advertisement also indicated that for the purpose of Mains

Examination, candidates 15 times the number of posts were to be

called. The total number of posts advertised for TSP Area were

(3 of 5)

[SAW-689/2022]

839 and for Non-TSP Area were 4,557. During the pendency of the

selection process, a corrigendum dated 28.10.2021 was issued by

the Selection Board which provided that all the candidates who

obtained such percentage aggregate marks as may be fixed by

the recruiting

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top