SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
DINESH MEHTA
CHAMPA LAL – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Order

25/11/2021 (Amended vide order dated 14.02.2022)

IA No.2/2021:

For the reasons stated, the application seeking preponement of the date is allowed.

The matter is taken up for consideration today itself.

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10850/2020:

1. The limited grievance that the petitioners have raised in this case is that they had made certain deposits in the respondent No.5 – Adarsh Credit Cooperative Society Limited under various schemes and heads, however, subsequently the respondent No.5 Establishment has been closed and a Liquidator was also appointed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that meanwhile the deposits of other creditors were released, however, the deposits made by the petitioners were not released. The petitioners make a limited prayer that the respondents may be directed to take a decision on the claim application of the petitioners seeking for release of the amount lying deposited with the respondent No.5.

3. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to take a decision on the application filed by the petitioners expeditiously preferably within a period of ninety days from the date of receipt of copy of this order strictly in accordance with rules and gui

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top