SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
MUBARIK – Appellant
Versus
RASIDA PRESENTLY – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

D.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1846/2018

Mubarik S/o Shri Nandushah, Aged About 33 Years, Ward No.

12, Churu, District Churu.

----Appellant

Versus

1.

Rasida Presently W/o Imran @ Kalu, B/c Quaji (Fakir),

R/o Gaon Bajav, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu.

2.

Imran @ Kaul S/o Shri Mumtaj, B/c Quaji (Fakir), R/o

Gaon Bajav, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu,

----Respondents

For Appellant(s)

:

Mr. I.R. Choudhary

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Saurabh Soni

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Judgment

DATE OF JUDGMENT

:::

22/09/2022

BY THE COURT:

Notice issued on an application under Section 5 of the

Limitation Act for condoning the delay occurred in filing of the

appeal has duly served. Shri Saurabh Soni, Advocate puts in

appearance on behalf of the respondents. Thus, service is

complete. It is pointed out that there is delay of 24 days in filing

the appeal.

Heard on application for condonation of delay. For the

reasons and grounds mentioned in the application, supported with

an affidavit, the same is allowed. Let the appeal be treated within

limitatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top