Advocates:
['NK SHARMA', '', 'DURGESH KHATRI', 'GUNJAN SHARMA', 'SAURABH SONI', 'PP', 'VIKAS']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4734/2022

1.

Sunil S/o Aatmaram, Aged About 30 Years, B/c Kumhar,

R/o Ward No. 16 Lalgarh Jattan, Dist. Sriganganagar,

Rajasthan.

2.

Vinod Kumar S/o Aatmaram, Aged About 31 Years, B/c

Kumhar, R/o Ward No. 16 Lalgarh Jattan, Dist.

Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.

3.

Aatmaram S/o Isharram, Aged About 60 Years, B/c

Kumhar, R/o Ward No. 16 Lalgarh Jattan, Dist.

Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.

4.

Manohar Lal S/o Isharram, Aged About 48 Years, B/c

Kumhar, R/o Ward No. 16 Lalgarh Jattan, Dist.

Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2.

Udaypal S/o Madanlal, Aged About 42 Years, B/c Jat, R/o

Ward No. 11 Lalgarh Jattan, Ps Lalgarh Jattan, Dist.

Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.

3.

Shayam Sunder S/o Madanlal, B/c Jat, R/o Ward No. 11

Lalgarh Jattan, Ps Lalgarh Jattan, Dist. Sriganganagar,

Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Gunjan Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Arun Kumar, PP

Mr. Vikas

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

22/08/2022

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel

for the respondent no.2 and 3 jointly submit that the petitioners

and the complainant have entered into a compromise in a dispute

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-4734/2022]

in question. It is thus submitted that the parties are not inclined to

proceed further in the matter.

2.

Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on

a decision of Supreme Court in case of Gian Singh V/s. State of

Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303].

3.

It is also submitted that upon the aforementioned

compromise, the learned court below vide order dated 04.10.2018

has accepted the compromise in relation to the offence under

Sections 341 and 323 of IPC.

4.

In view of compromise arrived at between the parties

as well as the aforesaid order dated 04.10.2018 of the learned

court below and applying the ratio in decision of Gian Singh Vs.

State of Punjab & Anr. (supra), this Court deems it just and

proper to invoke its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

5.

Accordingly, the present misc. petition is allowed and

the petitioners are discharged of the offence under Sections 324,

326 & 34 of IPC as well, in relation to Criminal Case No.389/2016

pending before learned Senior Civil Judge & Additional Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Sadulsahar.

6.

All pending applications also stand disposed of

accordingly.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

48-Sudheer/-