SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
MUSKAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRLMP 3233/2020



(1 of 2)

[CRLMP-3233/2020]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3233/2020

1.

Muskan W/o Arjun, Aged About 20 Years, By Caste

Musalman, R/o Dharmveer Maidan Pratap Bazar, Rani

District Pali, Rajasthan.

2.

Arjun S/o Hansaram, Aged About 25 Years, By Caste

Heeragar (Sargara), R/o Dharmveer Maidan, Pratap

Bazar, Rani, District Pali, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs,

Pali (Raj.).

2.

Director General Of Police, Govt Of Rajasthan, Police Head

Quarter, Pali.

3.

The Superintendent Of Police, Pali, Rajasthan.

4.

The S.h.o. Police Station, Rani, District Pali, Rajasthan.

5.

Mohhammad Ahsan S/o Abdul Ji, Aged About 45 Years,

Opposite Dharmveer Maidan, Pratap Bazar, Rani, District

Pali, Rajasthan.

6.

Shaheed S/o Mohd. Ahsan, Opposite Dharmveer Maidan,

Pratap Bazar, Rani, District Pali, Rajasthan.

7.

Vahid S/o Abdul Gaffur, Opposite Dharmveer Maidan,

Pratap Bazar, Rani, District Pali, Rajasthan.

8.

Sakoor S/o Abdul Gaffur, Opposite Dharmveer Maidan,

Pratap Bazar, Rani, District Pali, Rajasthan.

9.

Majid S/o Abdul Gaffur, Opposite Dharmveer Maidan,

Pratap Bazar, Rani, District Pali, Rajasthan.

10.

Hameed S/o Abdul Gaffur, Opposite Dharmveer Maidan,

Pratap Bazar, Rani, District Pali, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Ripudaman Singh

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

03/02/2021

1.

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being

taken while hearing the matters in Court.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-3233/2020]

2.

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition

under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to

the official respondents to provide adequate security and

protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing

grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private

respondents.

3.

Counsel for the petitioners submit that Article 21 of the

Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal liberty

under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same

amounts to violation of the same.

4.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as

perusing the record of the case, this Court disposes of the present

petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the

Station House Officer, Police Station Rani, District Pali alongwith

appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The SHO

concerned shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners, and

after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass

necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to

the petitioners.

5.

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not

affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the

petitioners.

6.

Stay petition also stands disposed of.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

183-Nirmala/Sanjay/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top