SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHIVJI RAM AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
HEERA RAM AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['PUROHIT', '', 'MAMTA JOSHI', 'ASHOK PATEL', '', 'MANISH PATEL']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ No. 9727/2014

Shivji Ram & Anr.

----Petitioner

Versus

Heera Ram & Ors.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. M.S. Purohit.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Manish Patel, AGC.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

Order

23/08/2018

Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material

available on record.

Through this writ petition under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India, the petitioners have approached this Court

for assailing the order (Annexure-3) dated 30.12.2013 passed by

the learned Additional District Collector, Didwana, District Nagaur

in Revision No.03/2009 whereby, the revision preferred by the

respondent Heera Ram under Section 97 of the Panchayati Raj Act

was accepted and the patta No.36 dated 22.01.1972 allegedly

issued by the Gram Panchayat Indokha in favour of the petitioner’s

father Late Shri Kaluram was quashed and set aside.

The thrust of arguments advanced by Shri M.S. Purohit,

learned counsel representing the petitioners was that the patta in

question came to be issued way back in the year 1972. The

revision was filed after significant delay in the year 2009 and thus,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top