HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
CHAINA RAM and ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS BAIL APPLICATION 9594/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
S.B. CRI. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION
NO.9594/2016
PETITIONER
1. Chaina Ram s/o Dhokal Ram
2. Smt.Suwati Devi w/o Chaina Ram
3. Mala Ram s/o Chaina Ram
4. Smt.Sua Devi w/o Mala Ram
All b/c Bishnoi, r/o Nagarasar, Tehsil Kolayat, District
Bikaner
VERSUS
RESPONDENT
The State of Rajasthan
Date of order
:
21.10.2016
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Mr.H.S.Kharlia, Senior Advocate assisted by
Mr.Bhawani Singh for the petitioners.
Mr.Ashok Upadhyay, PP for the State.
Mr.B.R.Vishnoi for the complainant.
<><><>
ORDER
1.
The petitioners have moved this anticipatory
bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
2.
The allegation in this FIR pertains to offence
under Section 302, 458 and 143 IPC.
3.
It is contended by counsel for the petitioner
that the police after due investigation filed negative
final report. A protest petition was filed by the
complainant on which the court has taken cognizance
against the petitioners. It is also contended that the
deceased was son and daughter-in-law of petitioners
No.1 & 2 and petitioners No.3 & 4 are brother and
brother-in-law of the deceased. It is also contended
that there is no injury on the body of the deceased.
One of the deceased committed suicide by hanging and
the other committed suicide by jumping in a tanka.
4.
Learned counsel for the complainant has
opposed the bail application.
5.
I have considered the rival contentions of the
parties.
5.
Considering the fact that the matter pertains
to the year 2014 and the police after due investigation
has filed the negative final report, also considering the
fact that there is no injury on the body of the
deceased, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the
present petitioner.
6.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application
is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest
of petitioner (1) Chaina Ram s/o Dhokal Ram, (2)
Smt.Suwati Devi w/o Chaina Ram, (3) Mala Ram
s/o Chaina Ram and Smt.Sua Devi w/o Mala Ram
in connection with F.I.R. No.278/2014, Police
Station Bajju, District Bikaner, the petitioners shall
be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a
personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with
two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of
the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the
following conditions:-
(i). that the petitioners shall make themselves
available for interrogation by a police officer as
and when required;
(ii). that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly
make any inducement, threat or promise to any
person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the
court or any police officer; and
(iii). that the petitioners shall not leave India without
previous permission of the court.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI), J.
skant/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.