SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT JODHPUR
RAJENDRA @ RAJU and ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
['VINEET JAIN', '', 'ASHOK KUMAR', 'PP']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR

RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

--------------------------------------------------------

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL (CRLMB) No. 9569 of 2016

Petitioner:-

Petitioner:-

1. Rajendra @ Raju S/o Shri Sohan Aheer, by caste

Aheer, Resident of Bawlas, Police Station Rashmi,

District Chittorgarh (Raj.).

2. Girdhari S/o Shri Rameshwar, by caste Purabiya

Gardri, Resident of Bawlas, Police Station Rashmi,

District Chittorgrh. (Raj.)

vs.

Respondent:-

The State of Rajasthan

Date of Order : 20.10.2016

HON'BLE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI, J.

Mr. Vineet Jain, for the petitioner.

Mr. ,Pankaj Avasthi, Public Prosecutor.

ORDER

-----

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as

well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused

the material on record.

The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.

100/2016 of Police Station, Bagor, District

Bhilwara for the offence punishable under Sections

8/15 of the NDPS Act. They have preferred this

bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has

submitted that the contraband recovered from the

petitioner is below commercial quantity.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the

bail application.

Having reg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top