HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
THE DEN and FACULTY CHAIRMAN SKRAU and ANR – Appellant
Versus
GUDDI @ RUCHIKA and ANR – Respondent
SAW 765/2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
JUDGMENT
D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.765/2014
The Dean and Faculty Chairman, Swami Keshwanand
Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner & Anr.
Vs.
Guddi @ Ruchika & Anr.
DATE OF JUDGMENT :::
22.09.2014
PRESENT
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SUNIL AMBWANI
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Mr. Manish Shishodia for the appellants.
Mr. Parvej Moyal for respondents.
_____
BY THE COURT:
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Having secured 72% marks in Secondary Examination
with the subjects in Physics, Chemistry and Biology by the
respondent-1 (petitioner), who is a candidate belonging to
Scheduled Caste category, she appeared in the Joint Entrance
Test (JET) – 2013 for various programmes including B.Sc.
(Hons.) Agriculture. She secured 33.48% marks in the JET-
2013, whereas the cut off marks in her category for admission
were 18.44%.
The respondent No.1 with 33.48% marks, applied for
admission in B.Sc.(Hons.) Agriculture course. The University
2
admitted her to the said course. After her admission, the
University found that she, having opted 'Home Science' as one
of the subjects in the Joint Entrance Test, could not be
admitted in B.Sc. (Hons.) Agriculture and cancelled her
admission. By that time, the respondent No.1-petitioner,
admitted in the college of Agriculture, Mandore, Jodhpur and
started pursuing her studies.
An interim order was passed by learned Single Judge
allowing her to proceed with her studies in B.Sc. (Hons.)
Agriculture. The interim order continued until it was vacated
on a day in the absence of the counsel appearing for
respondent No.1-petitioner.
By the impugned judgment, learned Single Judge,
considering the facts and circumstances of the case and
judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court cited by learned counsel
for the University, allowed the writ petition with the finding
that the responent No.1-petitioner, was eligible for the B.Sc.
(Hons.) Agriculture Programme in the College of Agriculture,
Mandore, Jodhpur. She had committed a bonafide error in
opting for B.Sc. (Hons.) Agriculture which is not permissible
for the students, who had opted for the subject 'Home
Science' as well as all the subjects given in Joint Entrance Test
(JET) – 2013. She was given admission by way of a bonafide
error which was thereafter sought to be rectified. Learned
3
Single Judge observed in his order that by admitting the
petitioner to the B.Sc. (Hons.) Course in Agriculture in College
of Agriculture, Mandor, Jodhpur, no one has suffered a loss as
there are still number of seats vacant in the course which
were not taken up by any students, who had appeared in the
Joint Entrance Test, 2013.
Learned counsel for the University submits that the
entire judgment of learned Single Judge is based on the
principles of equity which is not attracted in college admission,
when the admission is wrongly given. He submits that it was
clearly provided in the Information Booklet with guidelines for
filling up of option forms (online) for admission in different
colleges under SKRAU, Bikaner & MPUAT, Udaipur for Joint
Entrance Test (JET) that a candidate, who opts for 'Home
Science' as a subject in JET, will not be admitted in B.Sc.
(Hons.) Agriculture Course. She took a chance in securing
higher marks, which are ordinarily awarded in the subject of
Home Science, as compared to other subjects. Despite clear
guidelines, she opted for B.Sc. (Hons.) Agriculture Course
which was given to her by the University. The error was
rectified at the earliest opportunity.
Learned counsel appearing for the University further
submits that learned Single Judge has recorded a finding that
the petitioner, having opted for the subject 'Home Science', as
4
one of the subjects for Joint Entrance Test (JET) – 2013, could
not be admitted for B.Sc.