Advocates:
['JITENDRA OJHA', 'PP', '', 'FARZAND ALI', 'ABHISHEK PUROHIT', 'RR CHHAPERWAL']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 252/2021

Jitendra Barot S/o Babu Lal, aged about 24 years, B/c Meena, R/

o Kanbai, Tehsil Kherwada, District Udaipur.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Department of

Home, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2.

Director General of Police, Rajasthan Jaipur.

3.

Inspector General of Police, Udaipur Range, Udaipur.

4.

Superintendent of Police, Udaipur, District Dungarpur.

5.

SHO Police Station Aaspur, District Dungarpur.

6.

Smt. Reena W/o Jitendra Barot D/o Nathu Ram Meena,

aged about 21 years, R/o Naya Gaon, Post Galiyana

Bankora, Police Station Aaspur, District Dungarpur.

7.

Nathu Meena S/o Heeer, B/c Meena, R/o Naya Gaon, Post

Galiyana Bankora, Police Station Aaspur, District

Dungarpur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Jitendra Ojha

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Farzand Ali, AAG assisted by

Mr. Abhishek Purohit

Mr. Sanjeev Swami, S.H.O. with Ms.

Kalpana, Belt No. 54, P.S. Aspur,

Distt. Dungarpur are present in

person

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS

Order

24/09/2021 (

In Camera)

The corpus – Mst. “R” has been produced in the Court by

Mr. Sanjeev Swami, S.H.O. with Ms. Kalpana, Belt No. 54, P.S.

Aspur, District Dungarpur.

(2 of 2)

[HC-252/2021]

We conferred with her ‘in camera’. With full confidence and

composure, she stated that the marriage ceremony which was

performed between her and the petitioner was by way of deceit

and she was not agreeable to the same.

We refrain from making any comments on the veracity of the

allegations made by the corpus. She has expressed firm desire to

be sent back to her father’s house.

We, therefore, direct that the corpus shall be forthwith

escorted to the place of her desire. The corpus has refused to

accept the amount of Rs. 10,000/- deposited by the petitioner by

way of peremptory cost in terms of the Order dated 07.09.2021.

The said amount shall be reimbursed to the petitioner.

The habeas corpus petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged.

(RAMESHWAR VYAS),J

(SANDEEP MEHTA),J

18-Inder/Rahul Arya/-