HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
OM PRAKASH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent
CRLMB 8623/2017
['DN YADAV', 'AMIT SHARMAAMIT SHARMA RAJESH LALWANI', 'AMIT SHARMA', 'PP VIPUL SINGHVI']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 8623/2017
Om Prakash Yadav S/o Deepchand Yadav, B/c Yadav R/o- C/o
Ramesh Singh, New Brahmpuri Colony Behind Satpur High
School Abu Road, District Sirohi Raj. Petitioner At Present
Lodged In Judicial Custody Central Jail, Sirohi
----Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India Through Dri, Jodhpur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr D.N.Yadav
Mr Rajesh Lalwani
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr Vipul Singhvi – Spl. P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
04/12/2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned Special Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on
record.
The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR
No.110/2017 of Police Station, Abu Road City, District Sirohi for
the offences punishable under Sections 8(C), 22, 28 and 29 of
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short
‘the NDPS Act’ hereinafter). He has preferred this bail application
under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that
the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued
that as per the prosecution story, specific intelligence regarding
manufacturing of Mephedrone - narcotic substance, was received
(2 of 5)
[CRLMB-8623/2017]
by Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence,
Mumbai Zone Unit on 24.05.2015 and pursuant to that, a raid on
factory premises of M/s Rishi Mine Chem Pvt. Ltd., Abu Road was
conducted on 25.05.2015 at 09.20 hours and narcotic substance
Mephedrone weighing 218.43 kgs. was recovered and the
petitioner was arrested on spot. It is argued that while raiding the
said premises, compliance of Section 47 of the NDPS Act was not
made by the Officers of DRI. Learned counsel for the petitioner
has also argued that as per the seizure memo prepared on
25.05.2015, in all 218.43 kgs. white powered substance purported
to be Mephedrone were seized under the provisions of NDPS Act.
The said narcotic contraband was filled in 9 bags and samples
thereof weighing 25 gms. were taken from each bag, however,
surprisingly when inventory of goods seized was prepared on
26.05.2015, all 9 bags contained 218.43 kgs. of Mephedrone.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that from bare
perusal of the said inventory, it is clear that no sample was taken
out from 9 bags, otherwise in the said inventory, total weight of
Mephedrone would have been reduced.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also invited
attention of this Court towards the inventory verification report
dated 06.08.2016 prepared under Section 52A of the NDPS Act
and argued that from the said inventory, it is clear that the weight
of the Mephedrone seized on 25.05.2015 i.e. 218.43 kgs. has
been increased to 230.082 kgs. at the time of inventory
verification done on 06.08.2018.
(3 of 5)
[CRLMB-8623/2017]
Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr Yadav has
submitted that from the above discrepancies, it is clear that the
investigating agency has conducted investigation in most
irresponsible manner and taking into consideration the said
lacunae in the investigation process, the petitioner, who is in
custody from last more than three and a half years, is entitled to
be released on bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted
that though charges were framed against the petitioner on
16.09.2017 but the trial could not be proceeded further on
account of arrest of one of the accused, against whom
supplementary charge-sheet has been filed by the DRI only in
October 2018. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner
that recently, the petitioner has suffered paralysis attack and for
the purpose of better treatment, he is required to be released on
bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also argued that
the petitioner has