SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
DINESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Judgment

Reportable Reserved on 20/11/2020 Pronounced on 02/12/2020

1. In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

2. This Court perused the material available on record.

3. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.321/2020 of Police Station Bichiwada, District Dungarpur for the offences under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act & Section 3/25 of Arms Act (CRLMB No.12956/2020); FIR No.296/2020 of Police Station Udaimandir, Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 3/25 & 5/25 of Arms Act (CRLMB No.13088/2020) and; FIR No.266/2020 of Police Station, Jai Narayan Vyas Colony, Bikaner for the offence under Section 3/25 of Arms Act (CRLMB No.13204/2020). They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Mr. R.S. Choudhary and Mr. Jitendra Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioners, at the threshold, raised a legal issue that all the offences under the Arms Act, 1959 (hereinafter also referred to as ‘the Act’), by virtue of a bare reading of Section 37 of the Act read with Section 436 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for brevity, ‘Cr.P.C.’), are bailable.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners thus, while

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top