IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR

RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL WRIT (CW) No. 10129 of 2016

Petitioner:

Sonal Sanshta, Through its Director, Shri Pukhraj S/o

Shri Chena Ram Meghwal, age 32 years, R/o bhinmal

Bai Pass Road, Hanuman Mandir, Ram Colony, Jalore.

Versus

1. State of Rajasthan Through : The Director, Rajasthan

Residential Education Institutes Society (REIS), Social

Justice & Authorities Department, Government of

Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Principal, Nishkramaniya Pashu Palak,

government Upper Primary Residential School, Village

Hariyali, District Jalore.

3. Shri Bandhu Rakshni Labour Suppliers, A-242

Sukhram Nagar, Raj Bagh, Sursagar, Jodhpur.

Date of Order : 14.9.2016

HON’BLE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI, J.

MR. Rakesh Arora, for the petitioner.

ORDER

The petitioner is being aggreived with the order

dated 2.7.2016 passed by the Principal, Nishkramaniya

Pashupalak, Government Upper Secondary Residential

School Village Hariyali, District Jalore. (respondent

No.2,) whereby, the tender bid submitted by the

respondent No.3 in response to the tender notice

dated 2.6.2016 has been accepted.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the

petitioner that the respondent No.3 is not fulfilling

qualification as mentioned in the tender notice dated

2.6.2016 but despite that the respondent No.2 has

accepted bid of the respondent No. 3 in illegal manner.

It is contended that the petitioner has already moved a

representation before the respondent No.2, rasing

objection regarding acceptance of the tender bid of the

respondent No.3, however, the respondent No. 2

without deciding the said objection of the petitioner is

bent upon to issue work order in favour respondent

No.3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has therefore,

prayed that a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to

decide his representation dated 19.7.2016 (Annex. 3)

expeditiously.

In view of limited prayed made by the learned

counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed

of with the direction to the respondent No.2 to decide

the representation of the petitioner dated 19.7.2016

(Annex.3) expeditiously, preferably within a period of

one week from the date of production of certified copy

of this order, strictly in accordance with law.

(VIJAY BISHNOI), J.

M.AKBAR-40