HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
SHUBHKARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRLMB 9378/2017
['SHREEKANT VERMA', '', 'ANJALI VERMA', 'PRITAM JOSHI', 'PP']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 9378 / 2017
Shubhkaran Son of Devkishan Ji, By Caste Kumahar, Resident of
Kumaharo Ka Mohalla, Bhinasar District Bikaner. (Lodged in
Central Jail, Bikaner)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shree Kant Verma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. OP Rathi
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMCHANDRA SINGH JHALA
Order
13/10/2017
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on
record.
The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.282/2017
of Police Station, Kotgate district Bikaner for the offence
punishable under Section 379 IPC. He has preferred this
bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that no
previous conviction has been recorded against the
petitioner and the offence is triable by Ist Class Magistrate.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail
application.
Having regard to the totality of the facts and
circumstances of the case and also looking to the fact that
no previous conviction has been recorded against the
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-9378/2017]
petitioner and the offence is triable by Ist Class Magistrate ,
without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I
deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused
petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Shubhkaran
son of Devkishan Ji shall be released on bail in connection
with FIR No.282/2017 of Police Station Kotgate district
Bikaner provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of
Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of
Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for
his appearance before that court on each and every date of
hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion
of the trial.
(RAMCHANDRA SINGH JHALA)J.
ns./230